BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > B3 Qualification Rules

B3 Qualification Rules

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
42032.4 in reply to 42032.3
Date: 8/10/2008 2:30:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
I said I was selfish... The best solution would be to have 3 or 4 teams from each country to qualify... I.1 finalists and Cup finalists... But once again, I'm selfish :)

This Post:
00
42032.5 in reply to 42032.4
Date: 8/10/2008 3:06:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I said I was selfish... The best solution would be to have 3 or 4 teams from each country to qualify... I.1 finalists and Cup finalists... But once again, I'm selfish

Nah, the really selfish solution is giving me a lifetime automatic qualification for B3.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
42032.6 in reply to 42032.3
Date: 8/10/2008 7:53:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
No it's not the best solution. The Div I runner up played a far tougher schedule and should be rewarded accordingly.


This Post:
00
42032.7 in reply to 42032.6
Date: 8/10/2008 7:58:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
No it's not the best solution. The Div I runner up played a far tougher schedule and should be rewarded accordingly.


B3 is not necessarily a reward for toughness of schedule. Plus, you can't exactly compare a round robin + playoffs with a direct elimination schedule anyhow.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
42032.9 in reply to 42032.8
Date: 8/10/2008 9:26:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
In the eventuality of the same team winning both competitions (as Abrantes Basket did in Portugal this season), the Cup runner-up would have the country's second spot in the B3.
why?

First of all, it is currently a standard practice in a number of European competitions.

Second, it gives the slot to the best positioned team in this tournament that hasn't already qualified through other means, while simultaneously guaranteeing that there is a representative from both competitions.

The bottom line is, if one teams get both the Championship and the Cup, then obviously no other team in this country has won anything. So unless you find it good to have 1 representative from countries like this, it's better to have the Cup runner-up in, rather than the league runner-up.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 8/10/2008 9:28:36 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
42032.10 in reply to 42032.9
Date: 8/10/2008 9:47:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
The runner-up team does win something. They win the 2nd place, and they even get a trophy to show for it.

Meanwhile the NTs have nothing to do with the B3 or the user's club.

And the choice of the Cup runner-up over the League runner-up is due to the fact that the League runner-up is basically a conference champion who might not even be the 2nd best team in the league. It is much better to assign the second spot in the B3 to a position where any team can reach (Cup runner-up) than to another that only 8 teams can reach (one side of the div I league).

Last edited by raonne at 8/10/2008 9:49:10 PM

Message deleted
This Post:
00
42032.14 in reply to 42032.13
Date: 8/10/2008 11:52:23 PM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
In my opinion, only winners should go to the BBB. The BBB is a competition between the best teams, the teams that won something, not the runner ups.
Therefore, if a team won both the league and the cup, it should be the only team of that country to go to the BBB.

Advertisement