BuzzerBeater Forums

may i ask why will u use low post?? because onli his PF and C have good inside shot skills, his PG, SG, SF all have veri noob inside shot, so im juz asking why u chose low post

In Low Post, PG, SG and SF has less matter. PF and C are strong and thats why I would choose Low Post. Even if C and PF has got good outside shooting skills, they are not shooting 3-pointers. Same with Low Post.

so is it true tat in motion, PF and C has less matter?? if tats true, wats the difference between motion and low post??

Motion- 3-Pointers, most of the shots by PG and SG
Low Post- 2-Pointers, most of the shots by C and PF

if so wat about my team??

SG
Weekly salary: $ 4 607
DMI: 29600
Age: 29
Height: 6'1" / 185 cm
Potential: star
Game Shape: strong

Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: average Handling: respectable
Driving: strong Passing: awful
Inside Shot: atrocious Inside Def.: inept
Rebounding: pitiful Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: pitiful Free Throw: inept

Experience: awful

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PG
Weekly salary: $ 5 329
DMI: 11600
Age: 22
Height: 6'3" / 190 cm
Potential: 6th man
Game Shape: average

Jump Shot: average Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: respectable
Driving: awful Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: inept Inside Def.: awful
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: mediocre
Stamina: average ↑ Free Throw: strong

Experience: atrocious

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SF
Weekly salary: $ 5 214
DMI: 10900
Age: 32
Height: 6'4" / 193 cm
Potential: allstar
Game Shape: mediocre

Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: average
Outside Def.: inept Handling: inept
Driving: inept Passing: mediocre
Inside Shot: inept Inside Def.: respectable
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: respectable Free Throw: average

Experience: respectable


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PF
Weekly salary: $ 8 123
DMI: 56300
Age: 30
Height: 6'9" / 206 cm
Potential: allstar *
Game Shape: strong

Jump Shot: strong Jump Range: pitiful
Outside Def.: inept Handling: inept
Driving: awful Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: proficient Inside Def.: respectable
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: mediocre Free Throw: strong

Experience: mediocre


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C
Weekly salary: $ 4 609
DMI: 10600
Age: 26
Height: 6'10" / 208 cm
Potential: star
Game Shape: average

Jump Shot: pitiful Jump Range: atrocious
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: mediocre
Driving: respectable Passing: awful
Inside Shot: average Inside Def.: average
Rebounding: respectable Shot Blocking: inept
Stamina: inept Free Throw: strong

Experience: atrocious

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Which offences should i use???


P.S. sry for wrong spelling

Patient or Low Post. Not 100% sure.

It's complete BS that PF does not matter in outside tactics. PF shoot a lot of 3-s when the opposition PF has a low OD value.
To everyone else: the point of this game is that you figure the best tactic out yourself (depending on you're current opponent). It's smart to mix up offences not just use one offence and one defence. Those teams are the easiest to play against because they are predictable.

It's smart to mix up offences not just use one offence and one defence. Those teams are the easiest to play against because they are predictable.

it's pretty easy to predict an loose against Torööö, even if you know his tactics before the game. And afaik he is running it from the beginning - and you could see that with other extremly succesfull teams, too.

I think in the club is it a solid strategy to concentrate on a main weapon, and make this hard to stop.
Even if i thinking to have a rooster who could play different tactics, is more fun and also could be succesful.

That's an extreme example. To bring in a team that would win pretty much all of his games with any tactic.
If he has every player outside oriented, then perhaps he will take the hit with the new game engine:P

That's an extreme example. To bring in a team that would win pretty much all of his games with any tactic.
If he has every player outside oriented, then perhaps he will take the hit with the new game engine:P

the thing is that he come to this point with exactly this style ;) So he got early succes with it(and not through trading), which gives him lot additional income to be such a dominating team.

I could gice you example who aren't that succesfull, but did you know them who they mean something for you? But if you look at the first two BBB, there are nearly all teams focussed on one offense, in the late rounds. I don't followed the other one's, so i can not say that this have change or not - but focussing on one offense seems to be a legitimate and succesfull tactic.

Are you serious? The game has changed a lot, compared to the game he started with.
BC Törööö has play a lot of different tactics. He might be stronger inside but you can not just play 2-3 against him every time or he burns you from the outside. Are actually giving newcomers advice to keep playing just one tactic. My god.
Whoever is reading this and just started please feel free to test out strategies and you can not win every game fielding 4 Centers and a PG + playing inside.