BuzzerBeater Forums

second one is transfer of funds between 5-10 teams.. Well organized crime player bidding would be much hard to stop. supporter or not.

I can't quite understand what you mean there, but I'm pretty sure it can be done also without autobid :).

Last edited by Lemonshine at 11/18/2014 7:50:09 PM

yes true, it can be don't with out. but it more effective with Auto-bid than without it. Its more rapid also more sure mandatory revenue.


Say for example I want to go up 1 mill and you mill 1.5 and next man 2 mill. we can do this all day, we don't have to win. Hell that would help push team to the top more rapidly. Buying super teams over night in top league

I will pay for supporter, no matter what current situation or my status is or will be. I will pay for it. This is the only way, that we can express our support to this game. And I vote NO. That would be the first sirious step to pay-for-win.

I wonder how many people still vote no if they don't want bb to install a autobidfeature. Or vote yes because they like it.
Please read carefully

pls don't take the route to pay-for-win games, you will seriusly lose a lto of managers and i don't think this feature will make you gain more supporters.

I wonder how many people still vote no if they don't want bb to install a autobidfeature. Or vote yes because they like it.
Please read carefully

Agree, but if you would recalculate it, i guess the numbers are still the same

only if you assume that people who don't understand it vote 50-50 between the two options. maybe they all voted no because they are against everything, or they are ~66-33 like the rest of the voters, maybe most of the people didn't get it. then it changed the results dramatically. for example: if 50% of all voters got it wrong both options would have the same amount of votes.
although if you read the question wrong in a way that you assume the question is: "do you want autobid?". not only the answers are switched, but the matter of the question is a completely different. the question is if it would give an unfair advantage.
maybe you think it would give an unfair advantage, but you still want to install it (you vote yes in both cases; funny is: a lot of pro-autobid managers would vote yes in the pol because of this reasoning, but hinder the implementation of autobid with this behaviour) or you think it think it doesn't give this advantage but you don't like the feature anymay (in both cases no).

this is also why "We hate this feature and we don't want implement it!" would not answer the question..

but yeah. i guess it doesn't really matter. in fact i prefer the way the question is asked. i just wanted to blabla a bit.



Last edited by jonte at 11/19/2014 11:22:47 AM

I think ultimately the result is very clear: most people do feel it would be an unfair advantage. The split hasn't changed over the last few days and is unlikely to change even if you get 500 or 5000 votes.

For the record, I do believe it should not be introduced for everybody, if it means significant less money from ads. The suggestions from Trainerman were aimed at reducing that effect (eg. allow the 1 autobid only in the last 12 hours of the auction) but the changes in terms of page hits would be difficult to estimate in any case.