BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > B3 Qualification Rules

B3 Qualification Rules

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
42032.40 in reply to 42032.8
Date: 8/11/2008 12:58:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Why are you boycotting BB3 next season? I missed if you gave a reason for it.

From: Pieriku

This Post:
00
42032.42 in reply to 42032.39
Date: 8/11/2008 6:30:50 PM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
Another thing that I forgot to mention is that it is desired to have always the same fixed number of participants in the competition. 2 teams per country plus the last B3 champion provides that.


Wrong. So far, the BB added new countries every season. So if they continue, you'll have new teams that will pretend to the BB next season. And other new ones the next season. And so on. So you'll not have a fixed number of participants.

This Post:
00
42032.43 in reply to 42032.42
Date: 8/12/2008 12:57:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Today also be and B3 schedule done ?

This Post:
00
42032.44 in reply to 42032.43
Date: 8/12/2008 3:32:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Tasmanian Eagles for me... seems a tasty R1 game on paper.... i cant see either the Japanese cup runner up or title runner up scheduled.. (unless they are due for a bye)..in which case i get a stinker of a draw!!!

oh well no money for champion and still no news to let us know the extent of the monetary handicap.... we've known now since 29/7 about taxes yet no-one can tell us how much we make for progressing in cup competitions....


This Post:
00
42032.45 in reply to 42032.44
Date: 8/12/2008 5:44:19 AM
Nitra Corgons
Extraliga
Overall Posts Rated:
10081008
Second Team:
Nitra Urpiners
25k for national cup round1..250k for cup title..maybe similar money for BBB btw.my team is mising in B3 round1,great.

1 BBB, 20 Leagues, 10 Tournaments, 3 Europe Titles (SVK), 2 World Bronzes (SVK), 2 Europe Bronzes (SVK,FRA), 42 Seasons NT coaching
This Post:
00
42032.46 in reply to 42032.44
Date: 8/12/2008 9:58:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717

Yeah, lucky draw for me. It´s a good thing i get to play an away game or else i think it would have been far to easy. This way i don´t get those incredible amounts of money either since my opponent have a small stadium.

This just worked out great for me;-)




This Post:
00
42032.48 in reply to 42032.47
Date: 8/12/2008 10:13:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717

Doesnt really matter, that wasnt the point of my post:-)

I was just expressing my delight in getting such an easy opponent in the first round, away no less;P


This Post:
00
42032.49 in reply to 42032.48
Date: 8/12/2008 10:46:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
that should be a comfortable win for you :-)

This Post:
00
42032.50 in reply to 42032.28
Date: 8/12/2008 11:14:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404


To the others: Anyway, I don't think a country should be punished for having the same team winning both tournaments. So we definitely should have 2 teams for each country. Why should Italy have an advantage over Portugal, Brasil, USA and Canada (for example)? No, does not make sense. Two teams per country is a must. Cup runner-up is simply the best solution, but the important thing is that each country has 2 spots.

But the level of differnt countries is various...in nations where there are 10 active teams is more easily to win,but oftent this team is weaker than a team of second italian or american division
So ther could be limitation for cuntry which have few active teams:nations with less than 100 active teams which have the same winner of National championship and cup cuuld had to hav an only team in B3...
And the winner of the last Be it have to be qualified directly to the next B3


Last edited by Steve Karenn at 8/12/2008 11:14:49 AM

Advertisement