BuzzerBeater Forums

In how many weeks your trainees make a pop in ID or Od when you train three roles
If your response is five or six weeks it's time to make a change!

I don't know if you read the whole thing, but I told that I am training my whole team in a balanced way.

One thing is to say that training your whole team could be a GOOD WAY to playing in BB(and i also make this),another is to request a training for defence as exist for shot(jump shot for SF-PF)

true. yet there are a lot more usefull other options to add to training.

if you train your whole team the SF automatically gets the OD and ID training as well. So adding an extra training designed for that would not be helpfull.

It would be helpfull for managers who focus on 1 sided training, but because it is that fast, it would bring them to much advantage compared to others.

As it is now, managers need to choose: train 1 sided, then buy a good SF with the money they make from their fast training. Or train slower but include your SF.

If it gets changed in a way the 1 sided training manages to train SF seperatly, they don't need to buy them, and can keep the money they otherwise had to spend, which they then have in excess of the other managers.
So the other managers are forced to follow the same practise. Gone is 1 option...

To me it is simpel: either they make every type of training available for any position, in a combination as we can choose, or they do not change a thing to this balanced system.
I don't think adding 1 or a few trainingoptions favouring 1 or 2 positions is going to do good to the game.

If it gets changed in a way the 1 sided training manages to train SF seperatly, they don't need to buy them, and can keep the money they otherwise had to spend, which they then have in excess of the other managers.

If you're doing everything you can to improve your team, that money will be spent on some player.

I'm not sure what having money or excess money had to do with this. Understand you're doing team training, but that's not a realistic/efficient option for very many teams. Older players, high salaried players, players at or near their cap, team training doesnt make sense for anyone that has these types of players.

it's not a request to favour the SF
Sf are now penalized
we asked a training 50-50% ID-OD
the pops in this two skill if i train only in Sf position will happen in the same time,but i could train my SF in his natural position,and if i want to focused on a specific skill(which i had to make for age,height,to be nera to the potential cup),i still had to change position to my player

we asked a training 50-50% ID-OD

This should be out of question. Next step would be this type of training for every position because you could make an allaround defensive team by training them at SF spot using this training. And it would cause a riot from Run and Gun teams arguing they low FG% and 3PT% even more.

What!? Trying to digest your jump to conclusions just about gave me vertigo.

All around players should be hard to train... so keep the SF training as it is. Otherwise give single spot training to every position in every skill simple!!!

But they will be easier to train than they are now...

I think that nothing has to be changed on training options, because I thinked about them slightly and I think that they are well-ballanced.

I will always have an dilema almost everytime I will switch the training and that is a best way. In my humble opinion.