BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > More tactical depth

More tactical depth

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
20820.41 in reply to 20820.38
Date: 1/16/2009 11:56:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Try not using 1 game as an example and look over multiple games and exclude out of bounds plays with 5 secs or less and you will see that 80% of the time the team gets the player they want the ball and i'm sure none of those times do they get their center wh cant hit 3's the game tying shot.

Even if you go back to Duncans game tying 3 last year in the playoff. He can hit that shot not the ideal shot for him but h can. You dont see Shaq or Dwight Howard popping 3's at the end of games.

Thats my point

3 times this year i have had a big man shoot an important shot from outside the paint at the end of a game. Yes you are right it happens from time to time but not every time.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
20820.42 in reply to 20820.39
Date: 1/16/2009 12:01:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
that is something that cant be known as their is no way of telling basketball IQ's in this game so you dont know what type of shots they are taking. The messages in the game dont help you find out either.

So until more information is given to the managers we have no idea of knowing how good of shots they are or not. I assume the offensive flow is based on how good your shots are or not but i doubt it works very well.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
20820.43 in reply to 20820.42
Date: 1/16/2009 12:02:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
that is something that cant be known as their is no way of telling basketball IQ's in this game so you dont know what type of shots they are taking


We sort of do, it's one of the player skills.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
20820.44 in reply to 20820.43
Date: 1/16/2009 12:25:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
are you reffering to Experience

if so there is a huge differencce to experience and Basketball IQ

Last edited by GM-ksachs at 1/16/2009 12:26:23 PM

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
20820.45 in reply to 20820.44
Date: 1/16/2009 12:34:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
are you reffering to Experience

if so there is a huge differencce to experience and Basketball IQ


Who says, in the context of BB?

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
20820.46 in reply to 20820.45
Date: 1/16/2009 12:51:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
a player who has 10 years of experience has his knowledge of the game improve. It does not mean he understands how to play the game and when to make the correct move. That is usually part of the IQ. You see plenty of young players who come into the league with a better understanding then some talented players who have been around for years.

What BB thinks i have no idea. I would like to know if they wouuld like to respond.

Whats your opionion on this. I want to know how to improve my team so that the right players get the correct shot at the correct time not just shooting whenever they think is a good time.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
20820.47 in reply to 20820.46
Date: 1/16/2009 12:59:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
a player who has 10 years of experience has his knowledge of the game improve. It does not mean he understands how to play the game and when to make the correct move. That is usually part of the IQ. You see plenty of young players who come into the league with a better understanding then some talented players who have been around for years.


Considering this is dealing in artificial intelligence, players wont have a natural, immeasurable IQ. The way it has to be done, under the current structure, is through experience.

Experience in BB does translate to IQ, with more experience equalling better and more appropriate shots, especially in the latter stages of a game.

The way to accomplish what you're looking for is to either build experience on players that you have, or make it a factor in future purchases.

BTW, I have a guy at strong, and he started out pretty low.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
20820.48 in reply to 20820.47
Date: 1/16/2009 2:54:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
they move about 1 number a year and all the rookies i've seen the last 2 years have very low experience so there should be a additional factor or some rookies if they dont already should start with a 3 or 4

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
20820.49 in reply to 20820.47
Date: 1/16/2009 2:54:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
BTW, I have a guy at strong, and he started out pretty low.

How low?

This Post:
00
20820.50 in reply to 20820.41
Date: 1/16/2009 9:41:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Man, I don't want to argue with you. In my last post I used 3 games from yesterday! You don't have any idea of the percentage of close games where the final shot is taken by a go-to player. Your number is conjecture and has no basis in fact. In yesterday's games, it was 1 out of 3. There are all sorts of possible situations, and many factors weghing on the outcome of a possession.

Duncan shooting a three is exactly what you are railing about, except with him you make an exception. You don't know what you are arguing. Tim Duncan is a career 18.9% three point shooter. In the playoffs he shoots 14.3% from behind the arc. Facts are difficult things to argue.

I'm not going to argue you with you anymore. In my last close game the other team's best shooter got the last second three and missed. So obviously the game engine worked right in that example.

I see some questionable possessions in all of my games, but that's hoop. It would be a little boring otherwise.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
20820.51 in reply to 20820.50
Date: 1/17/2009 5:39:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
than i wont keep this going after this. But forget % a good shooter from 20 feet mightnot be from 23. But he can hit a jump shot. That was my point. You dont see Shaq or Howard even looking from beyond 15.

That fact still is that at end of games situations the chances are that your ;ast option or 2 should not take the majority of your shots in the last 30 secs of a game. That is my point and it has happened to my 4 times this year and only once did it work out (that time i was winning the game and thgat might have been my best shot on the paticular day). I'm not saying i win the other games if the correct player takes the shot but it could except the loss easier.

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
Advertisement