BuzzerBeater Forums

This team can be countered with:

3x
standard PG with 10+IS high DR

2x
SB 20+ ID 20 Reb 20 IS 5 PA 15

3-2, LI

your team will force more TO but since i have good PA and HD it will be limited.
They will get destroyed on the rebs. I have quite likely the best inside defense rebounder in the game on my team, build for 1-3-1 zone. (Its a pity the chinese NT coach never uses him for this) The reason i dont play that often is that the 3-2 works so well without the reb penalty.
They also can not defend layups while i can defend theirs, but the main reason they will lose is rebs.


Since they cant shoot outside you could even go 2-3 with 3 of the above bigs



Last edited by Robard at 7/28/2016 3:43:18 AM

More time on training? No.
The bigs i posted use big man skills only that train very fast on tall players + PA which trains fast independent of size and some 1o1 for HD and DR...EASY training.

The guards are standard PG players and also very easily trained.

Your type of player will either train slow on OD or slow in IS (depending on size) as with 1o1 you dont get IS to 20.

My team is more expensive on salary (and yours is below the cap for 1. league, so more expensive than you think ;) but it will also win, which is good reason to pay more :p

Last edited by Robard at 7/28/2016 6:58:50 AM

tldr: your team will train 1 or 2 saisons less than mine to reach the given skills

I agree. You will still lose. To create a losing team you dont need any training.
To challenge the team i proposed you need a lot RB, ID, SB on your 5'10 guards which will take time to train, that was my point.

Dont get me wrong, i do agree that your ODDRIS will perform well compared to the salary, i just disagree with your implication that this will be the ultimate winning formula for BB. Thats why i proposed a team to counter yours that is similar (not quite as fast but still) easy to train.

Which leads back to the original topic: specialized offense teams like yours will always be one-dimensional and will be easily to predict while specialized defense teams like the one Manon tries to build will not face this problem as they are equally good vs all offenses and there is no GDP on defense. Only time will tell if this approach is successfull at the highest level.

I do. In most of those cases they chose between getting predicted or a less optimal offense.
Thats not really the same thing. Nr. 1 and 2 seeds just lost first round of PO btw. both using LI vs non LI.