BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Forum day: OD in new engine

Forum day: OD in new engine (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: brian

This Post:
00
112356.42 in reply to 112356.35
Date: 10/9/2009 11:05:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Ah, ic. Nevermind then


"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
112356.43 in reply to 112356.37
Date: 10/9/2009 11:17:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
s9 playoff game

(15418608)


In this case, the SG was actually the 2nd best option on the court, so no big surprise that he took a lot of shots. Plus you had a prominent inside shot vs a senational inside d. The outside matchup actually looks like it was better.

Care to make another try. ;-)

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
112356.44 in reply to 112356.43
Date: 10/9/2009 12:31:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Ok, I might as well do some of the work. This low post seems to have worked to some extent, even though the game was lost:

(15719366)

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
112356.45 in reply to 112356.43
Date: 10/9/2009 12:32:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
lol nope, those were all the Low Post i've ever played.

This Post:
00
112356.46 in reply to 112356.45
Date: 10/9/2009 12:53:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Ok, here is an example of a failed low post:

(7290)

I think I am convinced that it is not a pace issue.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
112356.47 in reply to 112356.46
Date: 10/15/2009 8:32:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
Check this one

(17519913)


Who cares?!
From: 7ton
This Post:
00
112356.48 in reply to 112356.47
Date: 10/17/2009 7:42:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Today I deliberately tried 3-2 zone against an inside team. It looks like it worked. Notice the FG of the guards and the no. of turnovers.
(15827919)

From: Marot

This Post:
00
112356.49 in reply to 112356.41
Date: 10/17/2009 8:16:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Well i dont really agree with you in some points.

Can you figure out how hard is to have a guard with good passing and good outside skills to attack for the outside teams? If you dont train some passing it will be really impossible to buy one because they are so expensive. For an inside team its easier to find a guard who only needs passing and OD and nothing more.

In my eyes, skills like handling were really useless with the old GE and outside teams were training that skills, so now the game is more balanced.

The point here is that if you are an inside team you will have 1 question when you play against one outside team. Whats better to use a 3-2 or man to man if you are using a PF as a SF in case that the PF havent a big OD. Thats the big difference with the 2-3, because the outside teams that use a PG or a SF without much inside skills they will play 2-3 for sure for the rebound more than for the help of the SF in the inside defense zone.

This GE is really balanced because now all the skills of the players are useful(well i still got doubts with SB)

From: ned

To: 7ton
This Post:
00
112356.50 in reply to 112356.48
Date: 10/17/2009 11:22:37 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
It seems to me you've chosen the best tactic in attack and the best in defense but I could also say that you've chosen the only tactic available to win if you are not 3 times better than your opponent. That's a pity imho more tactics more fun.

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: Stratos

To: ned
This Post:
00
112356.51 in reply to 112356.50
Date: 10/17/2009 8:08:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
Ahhh damn ¬¬

(15699062)

Last edited by Stratos at 10/17/2009 8:08:20 PM

Who cares?!
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
112356.52 in reply to 112356.49
Date: 10/18/2009 5:20:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i think the problem is, that you need very good guards for playing LI and just average center for playing Run and gun.

With the 3-2 Zone we maybe sen changes from the old to the new ge, where the 2-3 Zone was superior and could be also be uses against outside tactics because of a big boost inr ebounding now the 3-2 Zone becomes universal.

The point here is that if you are an inside team you will have 1 question when you play against one outside team. Whats better to use a 3-2 or man to man if you are using a PF as a SF in case that the PF havent a big OD.


i tested it in two games with such a PF, i am not toatlly convinced about the effectiness of this Zone anymore, even for SF with low OD.

Advertisement