BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Nbrs are falling - Buzzerbeater whats wrong & how can it be fixed?

Nbrs are falling - Buzzerbeater whats wrong & how can it be fixed?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
251069.429 in reply to 251069.428
Date: 1/5/2014 6:44:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3030
Not to dis agree but at same time, If it was seeded lower team would never win past the second round. The higher league seed would be right on them, every single time.


Isn't that how tournaments and competitions are supposed to work?

This Post:
00
251069.430 in reply to 251069.428
Date: 1/5/2014 6:44:54 PM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
I agree too, I like the way it is, if you're lucky you can get past some teams and get some money, if you're not, well, at least you don't have to worry about game shape anymore :)

For example, in my first season I won first 4 rounds, with the scrubs team. And this year, I got a first div team in the second round. He has one player with 180k salary, while my whole team is 144k LOL I hope he'll ditch the cup, to focus on the league :)

Last edited by Aleksandar at 1/5/2014 6:47:03 PM

This Post:
00
251069.431 in reply to 251069.430
Date: 1/5/2014 7:10:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3030
But should you really have to depend on luck when there are bot teams playing other bot teams?

This Post:
00
251069.433 in reply to 251069.429
Date: 1/5/2014 8:26:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Not to dis agree but at same time, If it was seeded lower team would never win past the second round. The higher league seed would be right on them, every single time.


Isn't that how tournaments and competitions are supposed to work?


The thing about random draws is that they are, by nature, random - I drew the same division II team in the first couple of rounds two of my first four seasons here. But the league and tournament structure seem to be based quite strongly on England's football/soccer structure (which is common in Europe, in fact). Leagues with promotion / relegation, and a national tournament (FA Cup) with completely random draws and which allows all teams in the nation (at least, in the first 10 levels of play) to enter. Of course, the FA Cup does give higher level teams byes into later rounds, so there are a lot of qualifying rounds first with the extreme low level teams before the bigger clubs start showing up, but in theory the top two teams in the game could play each other well before the finals.

This Post:
00
251069.434 in reply to 251069.433
Date: 1/5/2014 9:59:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3030
I understand what you are getting at with the soccer comparison, but the English soccer structure doesn't have bot teams playing each other at the expense of human controlled teams.

Like I said before, if it didn't have a monetary component it wouldn't be a problem. The tournament has an effect on overall fan support which influences attendance as well as the 50k purse for winning each game.

This Post:
00
251069.435 in reply to 251069.434
Date: 1/5/2014 10:07:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12661266
So you prefer to take on a Div II side in round 1? I do not see how it will be good for anyone other then the top level sides to do the draw seeded.

This Post:
11
251069.436 in reply to 251069.434
Date: 1/6/2014 8:07:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I understand what you are getting at with the soccer comparison, but the English soccer structure doesn't have bot teams playing each other at the expense of human controlled teams.

Like I said before, if it didn't have a monetary component it wouldn't be a problem. The tournament has an effect on overall fan support which influences attendance as well as the 50k purse for winning each game.


No, because there are no bot teams in England, but other than having teams from different levels entering the tournament at different times and having the very early qualifying rounds drawn with geographic constraints (no need for ninth-level teams to travel cross country), the draw is entirely random. There are often times where low level teams are facing off while higher level teams are facing off. And they, like BB, have prize money awarded to the winners which varies based on each round.

In short, the whole idea of a seeded tournament is fine - HT uses that - but a completely random tournament is fun too and definitely has precedent in the real sporting world.

This Post:
22
251069.437 in reply to 251069.434
Date: 1/6/2014 11:08:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
111111
My problem with seeded tournament...

Enthusiasm of teams.

If it were seeded... many higher level teams, would no longer have to make choices of... "Do I win a league game, or do I win a cup game? Do I play this player this long and mess up his gameshape or do I play his back-ups? Etc."

Similarly. you'd be taking that away from everyone else too.

The difference is Majority of D. V, and seriously way more D. IV people than you'd think, don't manage enthusiasm or gameshape that well either. So, not only are you giving advantage to the managers that know how to manage this, but you're taking away more possibilities for the D. V human team, or D. IV human team, to crunch time their cup game, and beat a better team in an upset.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
251069.439 in reply to 251069.437
Date: 1/7/2014 12:08:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3939
I definitely think that keeping the tournament unseeded is the way to go. New teams need the money to build their franchise's up from the bottom, not to mention it keeps new owners engaged in the different aspects of BB. Older teams don't need the money (sure everyone wants more money) and they don't need the incentive to stay engaged in BB as a whole.

Advertisement