BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Pornchai Junsit (6616095) The Undead

Pornchai Junsit (6616095) The Undead

Set priority
Show messages by
From: leojf

This Post:
00
214349.43 in reply to 214349.42
Date: 5/3/2012 12:22:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
it is an old post, and the policy is changed like you said it is possible to be scared about there salary and it should be possible to get rid of them before the next salary update. if he is fired, he lands on the transferlist and when nobody is buying him he get retired.

I don´t think so. I have two NT players and I can't get rid of them.

This Post:
11
214349.45 in reply to 214349.44
Date: 5/4/2012 7:45:14 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Yes, NT players can only be sold, not fired. If they are put on the transfer list automatically (team banned, inactive) they are put at their salary*10 price, max 1M. If they are not sold, they retire just like other players. It means nobody was willing to spend 1M on him and pay for his salary after that. Nothing wrong there.

Also, during the offseason, we will clean up all the NT's from retired players. Also, we will add code that removes a player from a NT once retired.

This Post:
00
214349.47 in reply to 214349.45
Date: 5/4/2012 8:16:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
(164307) - the team is either banned or inactive, and since he still have player and didn't sold him i doubt he was bancrupt too.

After i got convinced that you can not fire NT(thought that got changed when fired player get on the transfermarket when fired and for salary monster such option wouldn't be bad), i beleive bielsa is right with the bug

This Post:
00
214349.48 in reply to 214349.46
Date: 5/4/2012 9:38:27 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Agreed, it was a bug that allowed him to fire the player. I've fixed the loophole so it shouldn't happen again. What do you think the correct course of action would be to do here? Relist the player for 1K?

This Post:
00
214349.50 in reply to 214349.49
Date: 5/4/2012 10:38:17 AM
This Post:
00
214349.52 in reply to 214349.51
Date: 5/4/2012 11:38:51 AM
Advertisement