BuzzerBeater Forums

Your example that hit 50k and sold for 400k is illegal under existing rules, without adding any new criteria.

If the four criteria is aimed to improve the efficiency of finding potiential frauds, I agree.

Last edited by 豹 at 5/10/2022 8:00:39 AM

What??

The market is FREE and should remain FREE! Transfer List may be 50% of the game. Putting some bad Day-Trading Cheating Report Guidelines or some of the terrible proposals made by some managers would only decrease the numbers of users.

This is OUTRAGEOUS. This topic should have a very different note because this is chaotic and brings worriment to the managers.

"Selling players in way above the market rates have always been against the rules. Recently, we witnessed an increasing amount of players", so we will be more strict with that. Also, we will educate new players writting a guide to avoid this troubles. That should have been the message!

What has to do if a player is part of the team for a year os less?
What if you buy a player for 1k (because it was 4 am) and sold him 100X or even more?

Ιts just two cases.
1. A player's worth is around 100k and a new team buys him for 1.500k.
2. A high potential player sold for outrageous money. In most cases not 18-20 years old. Because the value of a young prospect with high potential can be very high. There you can be friendly for new users.

The learning prosess reguires mistakes for every manager. There was already chaos with player exhaustion, buzzer doesnt need another one fo no reason at all. Limits about new players or players purchased in the last 30 days cannot be relisted for more than 3x their value are bad ideas. The game should remain simple.

1. The player was not part of the team for more than a season. Going more into specifics - the player in question was apart of the team for only couple of weeks

you mean a part, right?

a player apart of (from?) the team means something quite the opposite of a part. perhaps it would be a decent idea to rectify this

This is the worst implementation of the history.
This is not the correct mode to increase the number of users.
:(

Saying “maybe” result in punishment or “needs to be enough” or “meaningful” training…what is enough or meaningful? That’s all subjective and should not be something you can rule on.

I would like to add something since most of the managers didnt quite get the overall feeling of the post.

I do not wish managers like darkonako or vagmak ( who is one of the oldest managers in the game) to get banned or punished harshly, but when you establish the criteria for a transfer to be extremely expensive, you must also decide the penalty methods that will be applied.

First 1-2 warnings, then some fines, and if the manager does not comply , only then he deserves a ban

The reason I posted their transfer histories is that they have huge and unfair profits. Training a useless player 1ON1 forwards for 3-4 weeks DOES NOT raise their price market. They are still useless players with low and unbalanced skillset that are trained 1on1 for some weeks...