Couldn't you effectively end agreements like this by giving no enthusiasm bonus if both teams TIE?I realize there is some downside to this...but just thought I throw it out there.SteveBruins
Except the magnitude of this effect is severely diminished, because the better teams won't be able to TIE. That's my point.Actually, that's our point.Right now, all the best teams are TIE'ing almost every game. So when we do run into a minnow, our enthu is so high that even an ill-conceived CT on the minnow's part (which would result in them losing subsequent games against lesser competition) would not result in a "shock" victory for the minnow.That's the first good point you've made.
Except the magnitude of this effect is severely diminished, because the better teams won't be able to TIE. That's my point.
The people who "have no clue how to manage their enthusiasm" should not listen to your advice on how to do so.CT'ing against the best teams, killing your chance of beating beatable teams? Are you mad?
Is this considered a legal activity or collusion?It does not really pass the smell test, but I know it happens with some teams and top-level leagues. The evidence is pretty clear when you look at the game reports.Is there an official BB position on this?
Enthusiasm levels directly affect defense and rebounding ratings.
ok so you see the effect on the NEXT game, not on the game you played TIE