BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Draft: Bigman or Little man?

Draft: Bigman or Little man?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: GWgw

This Post:
00
188244.44 in reply to 188244.42
Date: 7/3/2011 6:07:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
But there will be lots of people training USA guards for the U21 team, so there is more "competition". If you want to get to the U21 you go with player B and make him into a SF (so you pray his OD is not too low to start). I don't know how anyone could think it is a better bet to get the PG onto U21. Sure he trains faster but will you have a superior or higher trainer to compete with all the other people trying to get onto the U21 squad? Plus who's to say you won't be "competing" against 6'0 PGs that come out with A+ skills? There is no guarantee of course but I think the higher probability clearly lies with player B. Also, what is a player position with 'Respectable' in all skills? I believe it is a PF ;)

From: Horns23

To: GWgw
This Post:
00
188244.45 in reply to 188244.44
Date: 7/3/2011 9:34:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Wow. Good point there. I just really hope his Outside isn't too bad at least mediocre.

Last edited by Horns23 at 7/3/2011 9:48:16 PM

This Post:
00
188244.46 in reply to 188244.1
Date: 7/5/2011 5:48:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Horns23 I would go for player B becuase he is a bigman if he keeps up with 25 PPG 15 RPG and 10 APG he would definetly make the U21 team so set your offense setting to Low Post so they will pass him the ball and he will score inside and set defense to 2-3 Zone so he can get rebounds thats what I would do.

This Post:
00
188244.47 in reply to 188244.46
Date: 7/5/2011 7:01:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Those stats seem very hard to do and if I get Player B I'm going to play him at point guard and center alot.

From: Horns23

This Post:
00
188244.48 in reply to 188244.47
Date: 7/6/2011 4:26:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
What worries me a lot is that not a lot of SF make it to U21 and that there is a lot of guards, Do you think well rounded SF would be harder to get on a team than a point guard because if I get player A I'm making him a pure point guard.

This Post:
00
188244.49 in reply to 188244.48
Date: 7/6/2011 5:42:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
You don't even know what these players look like yet, perhaps neither of them will have a chance at U21.

Take who you're comfortable with but when everyone is telling you how much easier it will be to train the guard, they ain't lying. Training the guard will also make it easier for you to train other players/guards. You shouldn't ignore that either.

This Post:
00
188244.50 in reply to 188244.49
Date: 7/6/2011 6:10:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Well both are probably going to have multi respectable starting skills since they are A rating so they do have a chance at U21 unless there's another part of U21 that I don't know about.

This Post:
00
188244.51 in reply to 188244.48
Date: 7/7/2011 5:24:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
What worries me a lot is that not a lot of SF make it to U21 and that there is a lot of guards, Do you think well rounded SF would be harder to get on a team than a point guard because if I get player A I'm making him a pure point guard.


in germany our coaches mostly complain about the missing of an SF, and i qualify for the world cup with a 19 year old SF in the roster to have one.

Also some player are in my eyes clearly SF, but often not shown as SF.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
188244.53 in reply to 188244.51
Date: 7/7/2011 10:07:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
in germany our coaches mostly complain about the missing of an SF, and i qualify for the world cup with a 19 year old SF in the roster to have one.

Also some player are in my eyes clearly SF, but often not shown as SF.


Okay what does this mean I'm kind of confused.

This Post:
00
188244.54 in reply to 188244.53
Date: 7/7/2011 10:12:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
that using SG there is often a problem of supply and not the favoured tactical choiche.

And sometimes the player who looks like an SG isn't an SG.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 7/7/2011 10:12:54 AM

Advertisement