556 online at 08:55:02

BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > false advertisement

false advertisement (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
206235.44 in reply to 206235.38
Date: 1/13/2012 6:54:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
only teh worst most obvious cases shoudl be punished

IN extreme obvious case of lying, then punish.

It's hard to define frontier between extreme lying and non extreme lying. In previous posts I described possible case when NT coach want to call only players with funny names. It isn't forbiden, and it could be interesting for community, so I can imagine candidate with similar plan starts in elections and win it. And then player with TSP=140 but with typical name would have no chance to play in NT, whilst player with TSP=40 but with funny name would play in every match ;-)

From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
206235.46 in reply to 206235.45
Date: 1/13/2012 8:26:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
No. Still You don't understand essence of issue.
We should have laws but they should be only good laws.
Why do You want to create this rule? It's simple. Because You don't trust that other manager has good intentions. In the same way I don't trust that You (or all other U21 managers) have good intentions ;-)
You should look at rules from broader perspective. Rules should not for You, rules should be for everybody ;-)

From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
206235.48 in reply to 206235.47
Date: 1/13/2012 11:45:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
This rule is not about trust.
Its about protecting people from thieves.

So then this rule wouldn't protect us (ordinary users) from NT/U21 coaches who are thieves ;-)
So this rule isn't needed if it protect us from one type of thief but at the same time open possibility for another type of thief ;-)

It wouldn't benefit me in anyway

It isn't 100% truth. One of Japan U21 player is Your player. So Your merchendise increases. Maybe Your player plays in U21 instead of discussed player ;-)

BTW the buyer of the player DID email me to ask

Still You don't understand that rules should be created to general case, not to specific case.
Maybe he doesn't trust You ;-) I think many people could consider that You spend to many time to complain current rules, engine, etc on forum instead of to try to exploit current rules and therefore You knowledge about U21 isn't as good as it could be ;-) He has right to think that You made wrong decision ;-)

I know why this discussion is so hard. Because it is discussion between two users, and one of us has better knowledge about NT/U21 than 2nd of us ;-) If You know what I mean ;-)

Message deleted
From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
206235.54 in reply to 206235.52
Date: 1/14/2012 5:52:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
Okey. It looks like You still can't understand. So last try. I explain You my plan.
1. I'm going to win elections - currently I think Japan should be good country for me, maybe even Japan U21, but it doesnt matter ;-)
2. Then I'm going to say that one player has no chance to play in my NT/U21.
3. And then, after few days, maybe weeks I'm going to change my opinion and I'm going to call this player and set him in NT/U21 match.

Please note, that all my steps described above are 100% legal. And they aren't immoral because opinion always could be changed. For example because of 6 the best player could be injured or in bad gameshape, etc. Maybe this plan is only perfidious, a little, but it is still legal ;-)

And it will be enough proof that You idea is bad ;-) Because it will show, that in this way, thanks Your idea, it is possible to penalize innocent users ;-)

I understand that You aren't happy when You see these advertisements. But You solution described in this topic is bad. You should try to find better solution. If it would be good - I would support it ;-)

Advertisement