BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Wrong formation/enthusiasm used

Wrong formation/enthusiasm used

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
26712.443 in reply to 26712.442
Date: 3/22/2011 11:24:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
You bolded the part about the CT when teams goes around 3-4 and have to wait relatively long time to go back at 5. It's exactly the same for those who are at 6-7 to go back at 5.

I'm sorry, but I just don't see your point here, even less so how does this contradict what I said in my post.

Edit: typo

Last edited by Mr. Hyde at 3/22/2011 11:26:18 PM

This Post:
00
26712.445 in reply to 26712.444
Date: 3/23/2011 12:57:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Listen, it's not that I don't believe you; it's just that you're not being very convincing.
I can agree with you that what is written in manual should be taken with some reserve, but you must admit that there is quite a difference between "next week or two," as stated in manual, and your evaluation of "one day" as something that is perfectly normal. I'm sorry, but the margin of error there is just too great for you to say so confidently that there is nothing wrong with what happened to me.
As far as your statement "enthusiasm system has not changed since I got on the game 3 years ago" is concerned, I'll just say that I have been playing this game for a while myself and my experience is much different from yours. I would say that nowadays is much harder to maintain high enthusiasm than it was 10 seasons ago, but whatever; I guess I just don't have any other choice but to give up on this argument.

Edit:
But all that aside, I want you to know that I appreciate your time and effort in this matter. There is nothing worse than come here and be ignored. Which is, sadly enough, the case most of the time.

Last edited by Mr. Hyde at 3/23/2011 1:01:55 AM

This Post:
44
26712.447 in reply to 26712.438
Date: 3/23/2011 10:40:55 AM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
It seems to me it's just a case of the numbers being rounded, and therefore seeing a lesser impact than actually occurred.

For example, you could have started with a 6.6 enthusiasm (it would have showed as 7). After a TIE (which increases your enthusiasm by 33%), your enthusiasm would have been 8.77 (it would show as 9). Enthusiasm tends towards 5 at each daily update, which is usually a few hours after games, after the update it could conceivably be at 8.4 (it would show it as 8). So, while you did receive a boost in enthusiasm, it may have only shown it as improving from 7 to 8, while it could have improved close to 2 (although with a few more days until the next game, could be a bit lower).

Personally, I like the gradual improvements (I usually estimate an increase of 1 from one game to the next when TIEing), because there seems to be a pretty significant bonus to have higher enthusiasm.

This Post:
00
26712.448 in reply to 26712.447
Date: 3/23/2011 2:23:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
That seems logical if we're to assume that my enthusiasm was indeed at 6.6 at the time, but if there is really nothing wrong with the way enthusiasm is being calculated right now, I can't see how that would be the case, because, with exception of one week, I have been TIEing regularly for past 5 weeks. Somehow, and you correct me if I'm wrong, I believe that should grant me a bit higher enthusiasm at the end of the day than just mere 6.6.

This Post:
00
26712.449 in reply to 26712.448
Date: 3/23/2011 4:20:30 PM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
By regularly, do mean that you had TIE'd for all cup and league games for 5 weeks and it was still only at 7? Or during some games you did, and others you didn't? If it's the former, yes, your enthusiasm should be higher (probably around 11); if it's the latter, it could very well have been 6.6 or somewhere close to it depending on when you played normal and if you were still in the cup.

Just my observation, it seems like this is less a bug, and should lead more into a suggestion on changing how enthusiasm works (or changing the game manual wording if that's wrong), although I personally like enthusiasm the way it is now.

This Post:
00
26712.450 in reply to 26712.449
Date: 3/24/2011 6:38:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
By regularly, do mean that you had TIE'd for all cup and league games for 5 weeks and it was still only at 7? Or during some games you did, and others you didn't? If it's the former, yes, your enthusiasm should be higher (probably around 11); if it's the latter, it could very well have been 6.6 or somewhere close to it depending on when you played normal and if you were still in the cup.

What I meant by "regularly" is at least once a week.
Now, you apparently think that "at least once a week for 5 straight weeks" shouldn't grant me higher enthusiasm than 6.6, or something in that range, and I, on the other end, disagree. And may I add, I disagree strongly.
But you're right, it seems that, at this point, this discussion should be moved to a different forum.

From: Kumboky
This Post:
00
26712.451 in reply to 26712.450
Date: 3/31/2011 1:49:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
GE started my substitute in place of my starting center in today scrimmage (32416715).
This is becoming real annoying, not to mention how much is messing our training minutes and player's form.
Can you please do something about this already?

This Post:
00
26712.452 in reply to 26712.451
Date: 3/31/2011 2:33:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
Maybe I'm missing something but it looks like your starting center Vid Grahovac played 44 minutes and your backup Stanko Peljušić played 4 minutes. Grahovac also started the game (Jump ball won by V. Grahovac (A). at very start) I don't see anyone else on your team that you regularly play as Center, so I'm not sure who you're referring to.

Where is the issue?

This Post:
00
26712.453 in reply to 26712.452
Date: 3/31/2011 6:07:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
And where exactly did you get that Grahovac was suppose to start in that scrimmage?
I set Peljusic as a starter. Grahovac was substitute. GE ignored my order and started Grahovac. Do you see the issue now?

Advertisement