BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread...2

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread...2 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152631.45 in reply to 152631.44
Date: 9/14/2010 2:54:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
good. continue.

This Post:
00
152631.46 in reply to 152631.45
Date: 9/14/2010 2:57:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
good. continue.


What? I don't understand what you are saying.

This Post:
00
152631.47 in reply to 152631.46
Date: 9/14/2010 2:59:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
i've wished to continue do what you do best. that's all.

This Post:
00
152631.48 in reply to 152631.47
Date: 9/14/2010 3:03:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
okay :)

This Post:
00
152631.50 in reply to 152631.49
Date: 9/16/2010 10:26:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
173173
here is my thoughts

for the match played 3/7/2010 (76-86 final score)

He played CT vs Normal (or Normal vs TIE) which means (from what I have seen from my matches) he has better percentage of shooting... also the fact that you use 2-3 defense zone allowed him to easily get the ball to the paint... check his assists , 28 that almost half of them coming from PG .. a man 2 man could do the deal

for the second match (100-98 final score after OT)

its a close call , also more or less the same issues that I mentioned above...

This Post:
00
152631.51 in reply to 152631.49
Date: 9/16/2010 10:51:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
I still think a 2-3 works against a Look Inside offense. You only pulled a pitiful (high) OD rating with it though which means that there wasn't any ball pressure on the passers so they were getting it inside to the bigs fairly easily though.

Still, with the first game, the opponent had HCA as well as playing with more enthusiasm which is a pretty tough combination to overcome so a 10 point loss isn't too bad.

2nd game, you clearly have some better bigs than him now, especially your center so you could have just gone with a man to man. It would have put more pressure on their guards and stopped them shooting 50% from the 3pt line.
You had HCA but he put more enthusiasm into the game again.
I'd say that your biggest issue with this game though would probably be the fact that you played a 3k rookie with atrocious stamina at PG for the entire game. He would have been falling over exhausted by the time the game ended.

This Post:
00
152631.53 in reply to 152631.52
Date: 9/16/2010 11:42:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
173173
home court advantage (HCA)

and yes.... according to the second match... if you played man 2 man you would have won easily

This Post:
00
152631.54 in reply to 152631.52
Date: 9/16/2010 11:53:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
first match lost only because of different effort and you've played on road, it was the biggest factors. second match was lost because you've had more turnovers and these 0-6 from 3pt line, probably was taken at last attack seconds, because your team could not deliver the ball into the paint. and in a close match like that, every detail counts.

Last edited by Rycka at 9/16/2010 11:53:51 AM

This Post:
00
152631.55 in reply to 152631.52
Date: 9/16/2010 7:14:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
2-3 zone is over valued, plus you had a bad outside defense.

M2M will work better against that team.

Advertisement