BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Season 30 Smack

Season 30 Smack

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
266312.45 in reply to 266312.44
Date: 2/10/2015 6:11:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
my own experience was shaped by my initial season or two in DII. getting out of DIII had been a struggle, and the team i had in DII, i soon realized, had no future in DII -- the players were all of a late-prime age, and i was never going to generate the income necessary to save money to replace them and stay at that level -- demotion was only a matter of time. still one of the toughest decisions i made in this game, i jettisoned the team at the beginning of a season, spent a season training and losing, demoted, and barely hung on in DIII until my youngsters got their feet on the ground.

a couple of lessons i learned:
-- the importance of constructing a team that will survive the next level. this is tricky, for not only is it necessary to win at the lower level, but i wanted the core of that team to be good enough to survive at the next level.
-- this is complicated by the vicious competition at the lower level. this may be too self-revealing, but i am guided by not losing rather than winning absolutely. i have a real aversion to relegation, and the idea of dropping down and then going through that process of promotion (with all the randomness involved as well as teams spending wildly the last three weeks of the season) -- no thanks.
-- my view of "winning" is skewed -- i think the amount of luck involved is important, and i have often seen seasons where the best team did not advance. or, in my case, that a lesser team did indeed win.

so, my approach to this game is building a franchise that lasts, that does not achieve and flame out -- my model is san antonio, and my goal is not the NBBA championship, but rather making that list magiker has of teams winning 100 games at this level. eventually this game will catch up to me, but i think for me the challenge is fighting all those forces trying to tear down my team.

This Post:
11
266312.46 in reply to 266312.32
Date: 2/10/2015 3:30:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
I've never had anything other than a level 1 Basic trainer since I began promoting from D5. When I ran my original team I did not see as good of a return as I would have liked purchasing a Level 5/6 trainer and spending countless amount of points on the draft. As many of you know more than most drafts are big busts even if you have a top 5 selection. You can easily spend $260k-$520k just on draft points in one season plus a high level trainer is easily another cool million. I chose to be a cheap arse and just buy and sell players as I promoted from one level to the next.

This Post:
00
266312.47 in reply to 266312.36
Date: 2/11/2015 9:10:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
I think he was losing at least that.

From: AZ

This Post:
00
266312.48 in reply to 266312.46
Date: 2/11/2015 11:42:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
134134
As many of you know more than most drafts are big busts even if you have a top 5 selection. You can easily spend $260k-$520k just on draft points in one season


In the past I'd agree with you completely. But the new changes that let you see actual skill levels as well as 19 year olds getting Strong instead of Respectable skills, means it's a bit more viable.

For my last draft, I had a bit of a gamble (that failed). Great trainee, height was around what I wanted, but only 4 ball potential. I believe that's supposed to be a 50/50 shot between Perennial All-Star and Superstar. He was the former. If he was actually a Superstar, he'd be a perfect pick. The next version of my team needs trainees with specific skill/height combos. So this weeds out all of the guys who don't fit the criteria. After that it's just hoping they're Superstar minimum.

So if you're just looking for generic high potential youngsters, I don't advise spending points on draft picks. If you're doing something funky with your training and builds, then it's more likely to be worth it.

From: Dmitri

This Post:
00
266312.49 in reply to 266312.43
Date: 2/11/2015 6:55:50 PM
Delta 9
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
6464
Second Team:
Euphoria Seekers
B3: Ya, so far, my schedule is like having an extra scrimmage each week ... that pays. I'd just like to say that B3 should not pay, as it just rewards the really, really good teams (who don't need $$). I'd like to see it a money-less league, for bragging rights & fun only. That said, Delta 9 is enjoying the extra cash: maybe we can stay a really, really good team for a bit longer ...

From: Jason

This Post:
00
266312.50 in reply to 266312.49
Date: 2/11/2015 7:09:50 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
11181118
B3:, really good teams (who don't need $$). ..


Sounds like a good problem to have!! If you feel that you don't need any extra money, let me give you the account number for the Arizona Desert Storm...we can always use more $$!!!

From: Dmitri

This Post:
11
266312.51 in reply to 266312.50
Date: 2/11/2015 8:01:43 PM
Delta 9
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
6464
Second Team:
Euphoria Seekers
Jason,
It was more of a democratic statement, than a team-economic one. Delta 9 is always short on cash, as I'm sure you are. I would just like to see less favoritism to established teams ...

From: Jason

This Post:
11
266312.52 in reply to 266312.51
Date: 2/11/2015 8:17:02 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
11181118
Jason,
It was more of a democratic statement, than a team-economic one. Delta 9 is always short on cash, as I'm sure you are. I would just like to see less favoritism to established teams ...


LOL, I thought the obviousness of the sarcasm in my response was fairly obvious....especially given that our teams do not have account numbers, and transferring money in BB is against the rules...but I'll try to be more obvious next time! lol

That said, I am not sure if I totally agree....teams in the top leagues do not receive promotion money or bonus money for winning their leagues....obviously the top league teams have a chance to go deeper in the cup, but that affects so few of the top teams anyway. The entire economy of BB is designed to drain your account, not grow your account...unless of course, you play in a smaller country and can win with less.

Message deleted
This Post:
11
266312.54 in reply to 266312.11
Date: 2/12/2015 9:08:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
I just looked through and realized that I'm the only team that hasn't gone bot from my first season in the NBBA. I believe there's one or two from my second...at least Wake Forest. Interestingly, that team is managed by the only person from the game I've met IRL, although it was actually a couple years before the game started.

This Post:
00
266312.55 in reply to 266312.11
Date: 2/18/2015 3:40:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
I noticed we already have an all NBBA tournament game looming...

Advertisement