BuzzerBeater Forums

which to answer the other questions is traditionally posted after all offseason computations are ready. The idea there is, whenever you see the news item you'll know offseason processing is finished.

I think the vast majority (I'd guess as close to unanimous as you'll get on this game) would rather get the news item earlier, and either find out the offseason processing is finished through an announcement/the forums/not at all. Please release it earlier if this is the only/main reason for holding onto the beginning of season news items.

I agree. Another argument to second this: a lot of countries need to translate news. And it's very unfortunate to release a seasons news after the first game(s) has/have been played! I'd really prefer to have the news announcement at the start of offseason processing! And I guess I'm not the only one.

I like the sledgehammer approach to LI-only teams. As long as that boost is strong enough.

I must compliment the BBs on the changes. They have addressed most of the immediate complaints and I'm looking forward to how the guessing system on tactics will work. Now if only they address the micronation issue.

The face/head editor for a team's draft picks is pretty cool.

Several good things in the news update. Good job BB

I agree. Great update for this season with the tactical balance and fan survey!

I love that they have made a change to the Fan Survey. Hopefully it's much more realistic.
The crazy Fan Survey and the draft/scouting are the two things that drive me crazy about this game.

The "fair play" financial change could be nice depending on how it's executed.

I have to say that right now I think I hate the idea of the upcoming opponent strategy guessing game. I understand that people want to balance out the strategies more, but I don't really want a game where I have to switch up strategies all the time for no other reason than fear of a guessing bonus. I especially don't want to have to worry about switching up defenses often since I feel like there is already a pretty big risk with playing the wrong zone. Maybe it will be fine, I'm not trying to bash, just voicing my reservations.
I'm hoping that the game engine changes aren't going to be an every season thing, especially since it takes a long time if you try to train and build a team the way you want it. It also introduces chances for just another strategy to become "overpowered", which results in more changes and makes everything seem pointless.

Also, as much as I don't want to side with angry guy, the GM comment about supporters not being customers is just wrong. Whether through paying for supporter or through ad revenue we're all customers and I don't see how telling people to just "stop paying for supporter" is helpful no matter how annoyed you are by their posts.

The face editor is pretty cool. Maybe it will cut down on the number of redheads.

- To more in depth tactics and possibly alter the LI domination, you will be able to guess your opponent strategy, giving you a boost.

So, to address a potential imbalance in the GE/Training/Salary structure a new feature will be added to help address the root cause. Wouldn't it make a little more sense to address the root cause and fix the imbalances directly?

The change to JR salary is a good move. It was seasons late on top of short notice, but a good move for the long term either way. Prefer more of this: tweaks to the GE, tweaks to training speed/option, tweaks to salary for skills.

This move comes across as ugly patchwork to hole in the system. The GE doesn't reward well balanced teams as it should so instead of fixing that a rock-paper-scissors gimmick gets introduced. It's not even original, it was stolen from Tecmo Bowl. lmao

Last edited by brian at 9/21/2013 12:03:31 AM

Fan Survey should be less dependent of the last game.

*Standing Ovation*

This move comes across as ugly patchwork to hole in the system. The GE doesn't reward well balanced teams as it should so instead of fixing that a rock-paper-scissors gimmick gets introduced.

Of course, everything depends on how it actually works in reality. But I think that it actually would reward balanced teams who can play different strategies effectively.