BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S25

BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S25

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
248998.46 in reply to 248998.40
Date: 11/18/2013 7:18:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
Good work. I'll be rolling in just under 1.25m with sale closing today. San Felipe is this years Venemous and will roll to an easy championship. The only interest left is if anyone can keep a game out of blowout. Odds against.


I dont understand the parallel you draw with Venemous. Is that because he was the most expensive roster in last season's best 32?

This Post:
00
248998.47 in reply to 248998.46
Date: 11/18/2013 7:50:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
You sir are an excellent, wise man. Just remember to train Gameshape and a couple of National teams will be foreber thankfull.

This Post:
00
248998.48 in reply to 248998.46
Date: 11/18/2013 9:17:25 AM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
The way I see it, everyone wants to win and the current rules enabled you to get an upper hand. People then want to change the rules. Good luck to you.

This Post:
00
248998.49 in reply to 248998.48
Date: 11/18/2013 9:21:37 AM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
Anyway, since we have a same situation again, I would like to advertise my idea here (250569.1), it's about making a limit to the number of foreign players per team. I believe it would help level the playing field in B3. Please add any comments or modifications that might make it possible.

This Post:
11
248998.50 in reply to 248998.46
Date: 11/18/2013 9:25:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Yeah, the total and quality of players that makeup that payroll makes the competition essentially pointless. It will be like college teams against NBA competition.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
248998.51 in reply to 248998.50
Date: 11/18/2013 9:52:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
B3 is still a challenge. How to beat a 1.8M team with 1M roster. I think it's possible.

From: Flamen

This Post:
11
248998.52 in reply to 248998.51
Date: 11/18/2013 10:20:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
Keep thinking. Wont happen.

From: brian

This Post:
00
248998.53 in reply to 248998.51
Date: 11/18/2013 10:53:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
These are good 1.8m rosters full of players with lots of skill points for their salary. These are high salaried and high valued players.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
77
248998.54 in reply to 248998.49
Date: 11/19/2013 4:28:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
I totally agree with you guys.

10-11 seasons ago I won my third ticket to B3 and after some experiencie on it, I realized that B3 wasn't really the place where best basketball managers face each other, but where the most financially strong teams payed unpayable rosters before bankrupcy, to try to win the competition.

So I decided to create a strategy to save money and stay competitive (I consider tanking too bored to actually do it) and it worked fine by me. Almost always made the POs and never put my team in relegation risk. Of course, since that period of time Chile has gone from 500+ users to 179 as today. Clearly not a micronation but not a superpower either.

After being the head tactical advisor of Chilean NT who won WC on S14 and made the finals on S16, have being Chilean NTM and achieving the better performance until that moment (a decent 5th place on WC), I decided B3 was the last goal for me.

The players that I trained are on optimal performance (32 years = maximum experience without skill-droping risk) and, honestly, I wasn't going to risk the work of 10-11 season holding my team of being 100% competitive, just to be defeated by a micronation manager with a 2M roster. So I played the same card but having my home-trained players and all my international experience behind them.

But yes, and as I, and many others, have said in countless occasions: B3 needs some kind of cap on salary or limitation. To help reduce the strong edge you can take by financially overpower your rivals. And don't get me wrong, better managers should have some edge over simply good basketball coaches, but not as strong as it can be right now.


This Post:
22
248998.55 in reply to 248998.54
Date: 11/19/2013 6:28:21 PM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
This part: better managers should have some edge over simply good basketball coaches

What good basketball coaches? You don't set any kind of individual tactics, or anything. Defenses don't work as intended, especially zones. Not to mention the recent game day preparation "buzzerbeater coaches have discovered that blah blah" which has nothing to do with tactical approach. This game leaves you no room to outsmart your opponent. No tactical things are simulated.

This Post:
33
248998.56 in reply to 248998.55
Date: 11/20/2013 1:05:30 AM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
I agree. And with most managers still running Blank Line ups, it is silly to say that there is anything difficult to even decide on game day. Just set your best players and let the AI choose where they will play. Blanks need to be put to rest already by the BBs.

Advertisement