Sorry, I'm jumping in here a little late. I'm actually tempted to slide this thread to the BB Global Forum since I'm not sure what the suggestion is here, but I'll leave it here for now.
Anyway, the real question I want to ask here is, would anybody suggest that using a three-center lineup is a good strategy? Is is something to try only if you are desperate? Or it is just a really bad idea that only works against bad teams or team that are heavily loaded with outside-oriented players and/or a player at the SF with poor ID and more likely to accumulate fouls?
I've seen the occasional conjecturing with a box score thrown in here or there, but I really would like to see a solid argument one way or another. I personally ran a 3C lineup out last week out of desperation (my regular starting SF is injured) in a game I figured I was probably going to lose anyway. My C playing at SF seems to have done okay, but he went against maybe the best "true SF" in my league and I wish I had a better outside defender in the position in retrospect. Do you all think I should expect better results if I try this again because it's a really good strategy, or did I get lucky that the game didn't go worse for me and it's generally good idea not to run a 3C lineup? I would like to see some real logical breakdown, maybe backed up by some data and statistical analysis. Maybe some serious nerds will chime in here.
Don't ask what sort of Chunks they are, you probably don't want to know. Blowing Chunks since Season 4!