BuzzerBeater Forums

nabbed 1 for 1,000 on 5/18 and another for 4750 same day

just frustrated that it took me 5 days, and 68k to nab a 3rd.

May I ask what exactly your TV revenue is? This way we can compare it to US D.II's, III's, and IV's.

And also I'd like to say your approach to the training then selling issue is a little bit silly, of course you shouldn't be able to buy a player and then sell that player and make money simply off training when compared to how much you payed for him along with salaries. It is when you begin to take into account the fact that the player was playing for you, hopefully winning games, putting fans in the seats and making you money that way that you can see if a player made you money.

And yes I too believe that the price for high potential rookies is outrageous but in my opinion a lot of that has to do with the lure of NT glory.

there's very little chance for NT glory for a perrennial all star rooke in the USA yet they can be outrageous priced too.

U21 Still Counts!!!! But seriously if it's under 100k it's not too bad.

"The revenue in small natoin has a glass ceiling . WE can never have the TV or arena money that big nations do, we are at about DII or DIII even sometimes comparative revenue of big nation...depending on nation size" -Wolph

For reference here is a list of US TV revenue(NBBA was at like 220k last season, not sure on this season)

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...

I'd say you are safely above any D.III revenue and most likely D.II as well, and not just in TV revenue but also in the arena cap and in the ease of having greater merchandising income.

Simple misunderstanding on the training then selling of players, and once again I would say the high prices for young'uns with high potential are the only ones out of line-and that's for the potential glory. Lower potential players, perennial allstar, sometimes even superstars can often be picked up easily enough and if trained properly can in my opinion still be sold for a profit or at least not too great of a loss.

On the FA point I tend to agree with you, they are for the most part unnecessary-though I do support the listing of all players on NTs who go bot.

Is this topic still about market balance? Your complains looks funny about micronation finances.

WE can never have the TV or arena money that big nations do, we are at about DII or DIII even sometimes comparative revenue of big nation...depending on nation size."

WHen I started in Nippon, in DII my TV money was 90k, from what I hear some DIIIs are at around 100 and most all big nation DIIs are over 100, maybe this is wrong. 189k in JBBL this season"

I would love to see my new TV contract worth 189k each week, but it is only 137k. In polish top league it is 220-225k and in Germany 240k. You should also remember that you can have higher merchandise on account of having
NT players in your roster. It is easier to make NT for you. Also you don't need to spend all you monet on salaries to stay competitive. You won last match with only 6 players, so probably you make big profit each week and stay unbeaten.

I spent over 4million building my arena the first 4 seasons. It is IMPOSSIBLE to make that on arena and TV income in DII Japan, the arena is too small and the TV too little. SO for my first 4 seasons my income from TV and arena was ZERO, I spent it ALL on my arena

You must be really sad after all this seasons. Cheer up! After 11 seasons I'm 2/3 way to make my arena looks like yours:)

Also our arena is also cappe,d we don't get that many high paying fans when we play bots or crummy teams regular season, it affects everything- arena, merch. etc.

I don't see any bot team in your league.

Your finance view might be a little distorted, because you have never player in Div IV oraz V.

Last edited by Pewu at 5/25/2012 5:54:27 AM

It's sound irresponsible that managers pays more for 18yo 5k draftee than 26yo 100k player.

If buyer is bidding on a player from his own country, I can understand him.

He wants to develop the player for his U21 and later NT. If this player will have 200k salary at age of 24, he will be getting around 30-40k merchandise on him alone (if he's a NT player of course). So he has a 160k player, giving him the output of 200k player, so he is saving 40k/week. Let's say his NT is playing 9 weeks/season, so he gets 360k/season back.

Now 1,5M doesn't look that awful now, does it?

And if the buyer is bidding on a player from another country (let's say USA manager, Italian player) and develops him into a great NT player, he will get a lot of money for him from Italians.

If hebuys him for 1.5M and then screws up the player's training, then THAT'S awful.

Last edited by Koperboy at 5/25/2012 6:13:13 AM

It's sound irresponsible that managers pays more for 18yo 5k draftee than 26yo 100k player.

If buyer is bidding on a player from his own country, I can understand him.

He wants to develop the player for his U21 and later NT. If this player will have 200k salary at age of 24, he will be getting around 30-40k merchandise on him alone (if he's a NT player of course). So he has a 160k player, giving him the output of 200k player, so he is saving 40k/week. Let's say his NT is playing 9 weeks/season, so he gets 360k/season back.

Now 1,5M doesn't look that awful now, does it?

And if the buyer is bidding on a player from another country (let's say USA manager, Italian player) and develops him into a great NT player, he will get a lot of money for him from Italians.

If hebuys him for 1.5M and then screws up the player's training, then THAT'S awful.

Calculations seems right, but in my country there are a lot >1M draftee transactions. I could say that just few reach level of 150k salary. Even more, only up to 10 can make national team. It means my player in polish NT can play only with stron or proficient game shape. If i have tough week including cup game, then my player will drop in stamina and I'll have less merchandise income.