BuzzerBeater Forums

One of the most recent examples: (53104879). I know I played with bigger enthusiasm, my PF was at GS 9 and his PF wasn't...but his PF has higher inside skills than mine and fouls out in 18 minutes anyway. Difference: HA, DR and JS of my PF.

So, you had better Inside Shooting, better OD, better ID, actually everything better, with higher enthusiasm, with more effort, in your court, and it's the JS in your PF that made the difference? ...

Last edited by MetallicA at 2/10/2013 5:33:08 PM

I'm sorry, but if this is what you are deducting from my post, then I won't even bother explaining.

Last edited by Koperboy at 2/10/2013 6:58:55 PM

In fact E-R found much better conclusions from Your game.
You were better in everything, You used more effort and You had HCA.
Your 170kish PF was in GS=9, his 230kish PF was in GS=7, it's huge difference in GS and little difference in main skills - therefore Your PF played better in this game.
So there is no big reason to consider secondaries.
Opponent's PF is extremally high foul prone, he has average of personal fouls over 3,0 in almost every season, and he was fouled out very often.
And what kind of fouls he had in this game?
- 4 fouls when Your player dunked after good pass (one of these dunks was successful) - these fouls were forced by PS and IS.
- 1 foul when Your player grabbed offensive rebound and tried to score immediately - this foul was forced by RB and IS
- finally 1 foul when Your player tried jump shot - yep, this foul was forced by JS, DV, HN. Only 1 of 6.
So proper conclusion should be:
Difference: for sure not HA, DR and JS of Your PF.

Last edited by B.B.King at 2/11/2013 11:13:55 AM