BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread....

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread.... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14900.48 in reply to 14900.47
Date: 2/11/2008 7:14:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
no it does not.

50% is really really good for 3 pt shots.

one team is shooting 50% with inept (low) outside scoring against mediocre(low) outs deff

the oppenent team is shooting less than 33% with respectable(low) outs. scoring vs inept(high) outs. deff

sure it is a lot more difficult to take 47 3pt shots compared to 10 but i think the difference in those ratings is HUGE



- secondly look at the inside def of croatia and the great inside shooting by new zealand

- thirdly for both, outs. and inside scoring look at the offensive flow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Last edited by Huzzel at 2/11/2008 7:16:35 PM

This Post:
00
14900.49 in reply to 14900.45
Date: 2/11/2008 7:48:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
The ratings only tell you about the oppertunity's your players' got. So your players got a lot of open shots, due to your respectable vs inept offence, but still they are not skilled enough to hit those 3-point shots, that's why you lose.

Your team just is not skilled enough to play a fast paced outside focus offense, your team has been beaten because of their bad shooting percentage, which is a direct result of the wrong tactic choice.

So you can 'bitch' at the match engine whatever you want, but if you choose the wrong tactic, which do not fit your team, you will lose. Which is explained very well in the rules as well.

So don't blame a wrong tactic chioce (don't only look at ratings) to the match engine.

This Post:
00
14900.50 in reply to 14900.41
Date: 2/12/2008 4:23:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
I belive that team ratings are wrong here... as well as matchup Ratings...

The box score shows that NZ had 43/89 FG= 48.31% and from their rating below, it does not seem to be the true...
Matchup Ratings
Position Points per 100 Shots
as PG 74.3
as SG 59.0
as SF 93.1
as PF 107.8
as C 63.7 TOTAL 397,9........... 397,9/5/2 = 39,79%FG


The box score shows that CROATIA had 39/104 FG= 37.5%
Matchup Ratings for Croatia
Position Points per 100 Shots
as PG 87.2
as SG 96.7
as SF 98.7
as PF 114.9
as C 127.8 TOTAL 525,3.......... 525,3/5/2 = 52,53%

So, both Matchup Ratings and Team Ratings might be showing opponents statistic, instead their... that is my guess...
Anyone who have more time could check this by finding out percentage of PG-s individualy, SG-s individualy...etc... and then compare it to those numbers...

P.S. I did not include FT attempts in this estimation (since i dont know if it is calculated in Position Points per 100 Shots), but I dont think that it would change those numbers significatly...
Again... This is all my guess...

P.P.S.
If true... should be posted in BUGS forum...

This Post:
00
14900.51 in reply to 14900.50
Date: 2/12/2008 4:49:42 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
I belive that team ratings are wrong here... as well as matchup Ratings...

The box score shows that NZ had 43/89 FG= 48.31% and from their rating below, it does not seem to be the true...
Matchup Ratings
Position Points per 100 Shots
as PG 74.3
as SG 59.0
as SF 93.1
as PF 107.8
as C 63.7 TOTAL 397,9........... 397,9/5/2 = 39,79%FG


The box score shows that CROATIA had 39/104 FG= 37.5%
Matchup Ratings for Croatia
Position Points per 100 Shots
as PG 87.2
as SG 96.7
as SF 98.7
as PF 114.9
as C 127.8 TOTAL 525,3.......... 525,3/5/2 = 52,53%

So, both Matchup Ratings and Team Ratings might be showing opponents statistic, instead their... that is my guess...
Anyone who have more time could check this by finding out percentage of PG-s individualy, SG-s individualy...etc... and then compare it to those numbers...

P.S. I did not include FT attempts in this estimation (since i dont know if it is calculated in Position Points per 100 Shots), but I dont think that it would change those numbers significatly...
Again... This is all my guess...

P.P.S.
If true... should be posted in BUGS forum...


it's not a bug

the matchup ratings show how many points a player would score by taking 100 shots in the game
of course no player in the game took all his 100 shots so if player_points/player_shots > MR/100 the player was only lucky (he took more good shots than the number you could expect from the matchup)

This Post:
00
14900.52 in reply to 14900.51
Date: 2/12/2008 5:01:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
I would not agree on that...
As I know... Position Points per 100 Shots... should represent percentage of FG (for different position...PG, SG, SF, PF, C) if you divide it by 2...
And average TEAM percentage = the sum of all players percentage divided by 5...
which should be the same as team % FG...

This Post:
00
14900.53 in reply to 14900.49
Date: 2/12/2008 5:57:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
The ratings only tell you about the oppertunity's your players' got.


i dont think u r right on that one. I believe those scoring ratings include everything, driving skill etc. AND shooting skills. unfortunately nothing is said about it in the rules.

anyways lets assume u r right. then your theory contradicts to the matchup ratings in this game. Croatia is far better in each position. so if you are right on the scoring ratings (what i dont believe), it would make this game even more absurd...

This Post:
00
14900.54 in reply to 14900.52
Date: 2/12/2008 5:58:50 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772

As I know... Position Points per 100 Shots... should represent percentage of FG (for different position...PG, SG, SF, PF, C) if you divide it by 2...


yes, but it's based on 100 shots. No player shoots 100 times in a game

And average TEAM percentage = the sum of all players percentage divided by 5...
which should be the same as team % FG...


no, that's just wrong maths because every player takes a different number of shots in tha game

This Post:
00
14900.55 in reply to 14900.54
Date: 2/12/2008 6:24:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
141141
looks like we are talking here about HUGE random, or about bug. because if you lose game where you think "should I play take it easy or not" it is a problem,
and if games like this happened in play off or in world championship it will be a much bigger problem.

it is OK to have random here, so weaker teams can beat stronger, but not with ratings like this.

vječna dilema, da li je bolje zabiti koš više ili primiti koš manje?
From: kuki29

This Post:
00
14900.56 in reply to 14900.55
Date: 2/12/2008 6:32:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
141141
there is also a players value questions

how can team with only 1 player with salary over 8000, and 2 with over 6000 beat teams with 10 players with salaries over 6000, and 4 of them with salaries over 8000?

Why to train players than? why should I buy players with bigger salary?

vječna dilema, da li je bolje zabiti koš više ili primiti koš manje?
From: Huzzel

This Post:
00
14900.57 in reply to 14900.56
Date: 2/12/2008 6:39:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
in salary calculation seems to be a random factor.

for example: this year two of my rookies look like twins if u look at their skills. one of them is slightly better but he earns only 3.3k and his brother being a bit worse earns 4.1k.

I have seen many more examples like that. my best shooting guard earns less than 1000 to a much worse SG

salary is just an incdication nothing more...

From: kuki29

This Post:
00
14900.58 in reply to 14900.57
Date: 2/12/2008 6:48:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
141141

salary is just an incdication nothing more...


yes, but a good indication. I think that player with 8000 salary is better than one with 5000. of course we are talking now, at the start of the season. later will be a diferent story, because you don't know if the players are trained or not

vječna dilema, da li je bolje zabiti koš više ili primiti koš manje?
Advertisement