BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Experience

Experience

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14914.48 in reply to 14914.47
Date: 11/17/2008 12:54:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
143143
At the moment, choosing the player, I still incorporate its expertise in the list of priorities when buying...However, experience - the last of what I draw attention...

This Post:
00
14914.49 in reply to 14914.47
Date: 11/17/2008 1:07:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
In my own "experience", it helps a lot at the end of the game. I have guys with proficient free throw shooting who for some reason shoot bricks at the end of the game. Is it a coincidence that they have atrocious experience?

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
14914.50 in reply to 14914.49
Date: 11/18/2008 6:13:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
I have seen many times that at the end of the game the team usually looks for experienced players in order to use most of the opportunity shoots.

From: Greedy
This Post:
00
14914.51 in reply to 14914.50
Date: 1/11/2009 2:56:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
My players who are proficient in experience did very well in a cup game compared to another player is better in terms of skill. Although that player who was better in skill got a pop in experience that week. I'm also not sure but I also had a game where I put my best defender on my opponent's best player. And through the first three quarters, that opponent was held to 3-13 fg%. But in the 4th quarter, he was unstoppable, shooting 5-5. I'm guess that that player has a high experience.

EDIT: My opponent's player was recently put on the transfer list and I was correct. His skills were not that great (his best skill was only respectable) but he had prominent experience.

Last edited by Greedy at 4/6/2009 4:50:07 AM

This Post:
00
14914.52 in reply to 14914.51
Date: 4/5/2009 9:47:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i don't know much but whenever my player with proficient experience is in the court during the final minutes, he always takes over. He doesn't have very good skills but he just takes over. One of my game went to overtime and I think he scored 7 of our 13 points in overtime.

This Post:
00
14914.53 in reply to 14914.52
Date: 4/6/2009 9:46:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
170170
Last Saturday I had a game which was decided with buzzerbeater in overtime. Last shot was taken by player with best experience in my team- mediocre. Coincidence?

(10996322)

This Post:
00
14914.54 in reply to 14914.53
Date: 4/6/2009 11:58:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
383383
not for sure. watch the last 30seconds of my last seasons first playoff-round:

(10431650)

distler at xp 2, while schrotz had 7, even the others had more than 2 (elliot4, gelincik3, balasauskas4)

Last edited by schubrakete at 4/6/2009 11:59:28 AM

This Post:
00
14914.55 in reply to 14914.4
Date: 4/8/2009 7:25:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
sounds like life.. But your about right

This Post:
00
14914.56 in reply to 14914.6
Date: 4/18/2009 1:58:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
yes mine went from atroucios to pitiful

This Post:
00
14914.57 in reply to 14914.11
Date: 5/20/2009 9:47:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Some of my most veteran players have kept the same experience level in IV leagues. However draftees have arrived with experience 2 levels hire. In my eyes, experience changes little from year to year. Experience appears to be a basketball intelligence score, rather than something which builds from year to year.
Interesting, I'm thankful you reported scores on your players and their NT life comparison. Pressure is tough in the NT so players don't play as smart.
Mitchell Dougherty 4163456 I coached from my first season.
Alexander Horn 6627293 is a recent draftee.

I would show you Cai Shunnan, a youngster, but he already has four years experience.

Age is compared to experience here.
My youngest player Cedric Forget 19 years old has atrocious experience.
My oldest player Antonio Cicchi 34 years old has respectable experience, topped only by Damien Paulin 28 years old, who has strong experience.

I think AGE is the most obvious correlation with experience.

This Post:
00
14914.58 in reply to 14914.57
Date: 5/21/2009 11:06:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I think AGE is the most obvious correlation with experience.


That's pretty clear - the longer someone is around, the more experience they have a chance to garner.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Advertisement