BuzzerBeater Forums

okay :)

here is my thoughts

for the match played 3/7/2010 (76-86 final score)

He played CT vs Normal (or Normal vs TIE) which means (from what I have seen from my matches) he has better percentage of shooting... also the fact that you use 2-3 defense zone allowed him to easily get the ball to the paint... check his assists , 28 that almost half of them coming from PG .. a man 2 man could do the deal

for the second match (100-98 final score after OT)

its a close call , also more or less the same issues that I mentioned above...

I still think a 2-3 works against a Look Inside offense. You only pulled a pitiful (high) OD rating with it though which means that there wasn't any ball pressure on the passers so they were getting it inside to the bigs fairly easily though.

Still, with the first game, the opponent had HCA as well as playing with more enthusiasm which is a pretty tough combination to overcome so a 10 point loss isn't too bad.

2nd game, you clearly have some better bigs than him now, especially your center so you could have just gone with a man to man. It would have put more pressure on their guards and stopped them shooting 50% from the 3pt line.
You had HCA but he put more enthusiasm into the game again.
I'd say that your biggest issue with this game though would probably be the fact that you played a 3k rookie with atrocious stamina at PG for the entire game. He would have been falling over exhausted by the time the game ended.

home court advantage (HCA)

and yes.... according to the second match... if you played man 2 man you would have won easily

first match lost only because of different effort and you've played on road, it was the biggest factors. second match was lost because you've had more turnovers and these 0-6 from 3pt line, probably was taken at last attack seconds, because your team could not deliver the ball into the paint. and in a close match like that, every detail counts.

Last edited by Rycka at 9/16/2010 11:53:51 AM

2-3 zone is over valued, plus you had a bad outside defense.

M2M will work better against that team.

(26044456)

Lost one of the most awfull games i played on BB, this GE havent any logic. It's not really logical what happened on my game.

Was winning by 20 when just for 9 min to end the game my SG is out for fouls(was supposed to play 48 min). I had a PG with OD 8 in PG-SF substitute, but what happened? My coach decided to put the substitute of PF-C with OD 1 in the SG position.

Even if i have in orders to do exactly what i tell, its a big flaw on the GE logic.

Last edited by Marot at 9/25/2010 10:32:28 PM

(25767135) thoughts on this one any one?