In fact E-R found much better conclusions from Your game.
You were better in everything, You used more effort and You had HCA.
Your 170kish PF was in GS=9, his 230kish PF was in GS=7, it's huge difference in GS and little difference in main skills - therefore Your PF played better in this game.
So there is no big reason to consider secondaries.
Opponent's PF is extremally high foul prone, he has average of personal fouls over 3,0 in almost every season, and he was fouled out very often.
And what kind of fouls he had in this game?
- 4 fouls when Your player dunked after good pass (one of these dunks was successful) - these fouls were forced by PS and IS.
- 1 foul when Your player grabbed offensive rebound and tried to score immediately - this foul was forced by RB and IS
- finally 1 foul when Your player tried jump shot - yep, this foul was forced by JS, DV, HN. Only 1 of 6.
So proper conclusion should be:
Difference: for sure not HA, DR and JS of Your PF.
Last edited by B.B.King at 2/11/2013 11:13:55 AM