BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Scrimmage Game Engine Feedback v2

Scrimmage Game Engine Feedback v2

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
87048.48 in reply to 87048.1
Date: 5/7/2009 4:25:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i ahve an problem with rebounding, too.

I win the rebounding duell 78-53 with similiar ratings, with a rebounding 3 PF and C who both gets 15 boards - the rebounding of my opponent wasn't that strong too bot he plays with real C and even on PF i expect an advantage in this area from him:

(12734032)

About blocking, in my eyes the amount of blocks increase, about 33% which is good but still it is mainly a Guard/SF thing.

And even it is an improvement, i believe you could reduce the impact of blocking in salary too, because it will be still overpaid but if you raise the impact it maybe wasn't fair for people who train for the old system and have centers with less blocking.

This Post:
00
87048.50 in reply to 87048.49
Date: 5/7/2009 5:10:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11011101
We are talking about this man:

Fabien Loiret (2541621)
Weekly salary: $ 3 174
DMI: 10500
Age: 23
Height: 6'1" / 185 cm
Potential: allstar *
Game Shape: respectable
Jump Shot: strong ↑ Jump Range: awful
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: inept
Driving: mediocre Passing: average
Inside Shot: average Inside Def.: inept
Rebounding: pitiful Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: awful Free Throw: pitiful

Experience: pitiful

*blush*

He's my cheerleader

This Post:
00
87048.52 in reply to 87048.51
Date: 5/7/2009 6:56:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
I'll just add another "erm, surely rebounds were messed up this week" post, as I gave up 36 offensive rebounds.

This Post:
00
87048.54 in reply to 87048.44
Date: 5/7/2009 9:07:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Yes, from what I have seen so far—admittedly with backups playing—the offensive rebounding is very "goofed" up. The opposing team has had 30+ offensive rebounds in every game, very uncharacteristic. This really needs to be addressed before it gets totally out of hand, IMO...Pappy

Pappy
This Post:
00
87048.55 in reply to 87048.54
Date: 5/7/2009 10:03:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Oh boy, and what will be said when people see the 73k center getting owned at rebounding by those 2k pieces of "pie".

So far, the rebounding changes are a big fat FAIL.

Hope it gets fixed in time.




This Post:
00
87048.56 in reply to 87048.53
Date: 5/8/2009 4:22:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
oh that an extreme example, but an nice one i hope they find their bug.

i see lot of cases where the worst team get most of the rebounds, mayb ethey switched something in this area when i watch your game.

This Post:
00
87048.58 in reply to 87048.49
Date: 5/8/2009 9:11:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
twoot twoot!
the bb apology express is in town!

it's a 53% OReb coverage.
I'm pretty sure the inside shot of the small forward doesn't have squat to do with it.

I am not saying there is no problem. As a matter of fact, there probably is.

On the other hand, stamina is a pretty important factor where rebounding is concerned, at least from my experience, and simply ignoring it is problematic.

As for Inside Shot, it might or might not affect how often a player tips in a shot. And a shot that's tipped in counts as an offensive rebound as well. Now that I think of it, the opposing player's Inside Defense might be a factor as well.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Advertisement