BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Marot
This Post:
00
93604.496 in reply to 93604.495
Date: 8/1/2009 3:57:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
If the last day mr.Mac was complaining about his rebounding, im really missing now if any BB can explain what happened in my game.

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/BBWeb/boxscore.aspx?MatchID=13105628

Look diference of the rebounds, i dont understand why he was able to take all that rebounds, when the lasts 20 min of the game his center was fouled with 6 and he used an SG to play as a C.

By the way my PF has a level of 17 in rebounding and my center is better than the other C that played on lasts minutes, but i consider he took more rebounds that he should have taken. Taking 10 ofensive is really normal? And i remember all the explanations given to mr.mac for his OR

Its really awful how its working the rebound on the new GE, it seems that just to be playing as a PF or C you are able to took rebounds. I continue thinking something is bad on the rebound system.

From: David
This Post:
00
93604.497 in reply to 93604.496
Date: 8/1/2009 4:15:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
107107
Is this normal? 1-3-1 defense against inside attack, playing at home, and losing the match by 19 points.

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/BBWeb/boxscore.aspx?MatchID=13105629

What you think? I do not understand anything. Is the zone working properly?

This Post:
00
93604.498 in reply to 93604.497
Date: 8/1/2009 4:16:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Once again, when both team have no defense, you can pretty much toss a coin about the win. In this particular game, your defense without a zone at home is almost as bad as his, with the wrong zone, away.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 8/1/2009 4:20:11 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.499 in reply to 93604.498
Date: 8/1/2009 4:20:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
1-3-1 is designed to help against outside attacks. Also, you were playing Away.



Is designed to defense outside attacks. Also he is playing at home

This Post:
00
93604.500 in reply to 93604.499
Date: 8/1/2009 4:22:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
1-3-1 is designed to help against outside attacks. Also, you were playing Away.



Is designed to defense outside attacks. Also he is playing at home

Right, that's why I edited my post.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.501 in reply to 93604.498
Date: 8/1/2009 4:27:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Once again, when both team have no defense, you can pretty much toss a coin about the win. In this particular game, your defense without a zone at home is almost as bad as his, with the wrong zone, away.



Cortacesped defended really bad with the zone 1-3-1 in compare with his man to man, by the way David was playing at home.

What i think is that with the old game engine, most sure is that he would win this game by +20 or so regarding to a bad choice by the opponnent using a 1-3-1 but i also cant understand why he lost by such a difference.

There is really 0 sense in this new GE, it remembers me to the first game of the season, lot of matches seems to be really at random.

This Post:
00
93604.502 in reply to 93604.498
Date: 8/1/2009 4:29:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
107107
Both defenses are bad but i think he defended worst than me,. I also had advantages in the field. I can understand to launch a coin to see who wins, but losing 19 seems excessive

This Post:
00
93604.503 in reply to 93604.502
Date: 8/1/2009 4:42:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Both defenses are bad but i think he defended worst than me
Both defenses are bad enough for this to matter very little.

I also had advantages in the field.
What advantage? Against the strong attack, both defenses were equally horrible. Against the weak attack, your opponent's defense was vastly superior.

All in all, a little out of the ordinary, but nothing particularly upsetting in this game.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.504 in reply to 93604.501
Date: 8/1/2009 4:44:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
but i also cant understand why he lost by such a difference.

Because a great OD counts for something, even when the opposition is playing Look Inside.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.505 in reply to 93604.503
Date: 8/1/2009 4:56:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
107107
you mean that it is best to put a 1-3-1 defense and fail, rather than a man to man and "half wrong"?

I thought that this new engine was going to hamper the defense area, and needed good defenders at every position, but still fail by far the defense, is better than man to man ...

This Post:
00
93604.506 in reply to 93604.505
Date: 8/1/2009 5:00:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
you mean that it is best to put a 1-3-1 defense and fail, rather than a man to man and "half wrong"?

I thought that this new engine was going to hamper the defense area, and needed good defenders at every position, but still fail by far the defense, is better than man to man ...

No, it's best to actually have defense. You have none, anywhere.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Advertisement