BuzzerBeater Forums

Look at my suggestion.

The team that comes 5th in the regular season will face the other group 5th. The first who wins two matches gains a small amount of money (about $50,000).

Of every idea I've ever heard, yours is the only ok one.

It depends on who is coming 7th in the other conference. At least in divIII where I play now, I say like Ali G: "I definately would"...take on anyone of those. They are either practically bots or just otherwise easy to beat, especially with home advantage.

for this season i would say yes, but i made one win to much to get extra on relegation spot ;)

With one income from a away PO game, i will made around -750.000-800.000$ in the last three weeks, without this game this would be a negative around a million as a fifth placed team. With on or 5/3 home games in the off seson, i half this negative till i getting profits.

Even in the last season i was near a bancrucy warning, and just survive through through the starts with too home games without downgrading my team.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/23/2009 6:06:20 PM

I don't know if somebody has already said this but... here it goes. Add revenue to the scrimmages of the teams that got out of the playoffs early and to the 5th place matches. To avoid messing with the regular scrimmages, just give this matches a different denomination. Simple.

if i read this with consideration of the different leagues, i will throw in the point of the last league(or last human) who also have relegation matches and where the 5th placed team even don't have the advantage of beeing save from relegation.

This is going to be addressed as part of the offseason changes. However, we really do not see it as poorly balanced; 5th place teams have no chance of being relegated. Would any 5th place teams truly prefer to risk relegation in order for an extra game's payout?

In Swedish division a team tried really hard to finish 6th and even lost to a bot team in last match to get these relegation matches despite the small risk of getting relegated. Team that finished 5th wanted to avoid 6th position because of the risk of relegation.

So there are examples. And I would also try hard to finish 6th if I had little or no chance of promotion even if I actually could get relegated. You also get to chose a draft pick earlier as advantage.

You also have the advantage of 3 extra matches which gives you more training so for me the advantages with 6th place is certainly worth the effort to avoid fifth.

It certainly is way too unfair. An alternative is to give very little money from attendances from relegation matches and to not make it possible to get one more match to get extra training minutes compared to 6th place finisher.

In another management game, Managerzone, there is extremely little attendance money from promotion/relegation matches to avoid unfair advantages of losing matches to get these extra matches. So not getting promoted and not avoiding relegation matches are not an option.

In my opinion, BB must make the 5th place worth more than 6th and 7th place. It should be a disadvantage to finish 6th or 7th both economically and for the risk of relegation.

In Managerzone, You get money from scrimmages and all the bots will be at the end of the table, taking away all the risk to be relegated. In everything else I agree with you:)

Here's another suggestion.

The team that ends fifth in the group will play a knockout game with the fourth of the same group for the entrance in the playoffs. The team that wins plays with the 1st.