BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Height for SF Training

Height for SF Training

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
138069.5 in reply to 138069.3
Date: 3/29/2010 3:59:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
Why not train all 3.
Have 1 Inside focussed, 1 outside and 1 as balanced as possible.
Once trained play 1 at SG one at SF and 1 at PF :D


:) and win B3

This Post:
00
138069.6 in reply to 138069.4
Date: 3/29/2010 9:20:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
And the 6'6" in my opinion, looks like he can be great all around.


I'm in a doubt with this height. He's too tall for guard training, and to short for big man training. Don't you think so?


I don't know I've been training a guy that is 6'7" and yes his big man skills do train a bit slower, but I think it is a good height for a PF. You will be able to add on the couple of side skills for him to be good.

And just to let the guy know my 6'7" guy trained in big man skills for 2 seasons and just hit 13k salary at the start of this season. So I wouldn't expect him to train fast, but if you are switching skills back and forth during the season he will still steadily become better.

This Post:
00
138069.7 in reply to 138069.6
Date: 3/29/2010 10:25:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
Do you think superstar is enough potential for creating "star" SF? Cause he needs skills at both ends and I'm afraid with this potential this player could start to slow down at the moment I make the training switch towards the opposite set of skills.

Btw, I'm talking about getting a player similar to this:

JS 14+ JR 12+
OD 12+ HN 12+
DV 12+ PA 12+
IS 13+ ID 12+
RB 10 + SB 5+

is this possible with superstar potential?

This Post:
00
138069.8 in reply to 138069.7
Date: 3/29/2010 10:53:00 AM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
545545
Well plugging those numbers into the salary calculator on the important threads page a player with those minumum skills will be on $80,553. The formula would have changed with the different salarys this season. But superstar will easily be enough to create a great SF.

This Post:
00
138069.9 in reply to 138069.8
Date: 3/29/2010 11:14:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
Well plugging those numbers into the salary calculator on the important threads page a player with those minumum skills will be on $80,553. The formula would have changed with the different salarys this season. But superstar will easily be enough to create a great SF.

Potential is more related to skills than salary.

This Post:
00
138069.10 in reply to 138069.9
Date: 3/29/2010 11:26:23 AM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
545545
So how would that work? Each potential has a limit on the total skills a player can have before training slows?

This Post:
00
138069.11 in reply to 138069.10
Date: 3/29/2010 12:00:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
So how would that work? Each potential has a limit on the total skills a player can have before training slows?

Not quite sure, but I think that's the closest statement to BB reality. If someone knows different then please post.

From: GC 30

This Post:
00
138069.12 in reply to 138069.9
Date: 3/29/2010 12:07:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
I think that for your idea of SF a smaller player 6'5 or 6'6 is the better choice

I just disagre that both defences should be the same,I think OD should be 2 levels above ID,that makes a smaller SF even better for trainig porpuses

and yes the potential is more related to skills,so I would advice you to dont let any skill go to higher,for example
train the JS up to 11 and balance your player,then finish the JS training

This Post:
00
138069.13 in reply to 138069.11
Date: 3/30/2010 1:52:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
Training 6'5 player on the inside skills is so slow...i am on that process, and is so frustrating...

From: GC 30

This Post:
00
138069.14 in reply to 138069.13
Date: 3/30/2010 10:27:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
how low?

This Post:
00
138069.15 in reply to 138069.13
Date: 3/30/2010 12:06:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
Training 6'5 player on the inside skills is so slow...i am on that process, and is so frustrating...

6'5". OK that's one information. What about these:
1. Age
2. Trainer
3. Number of training positions

and it he is already well developed
4. potential
5. current level of skills that you are training (high or low)

Advertisement