BuzzerBeater Forums

I support 5 and 7.
I dis-support all the others as I think it is better the way it is of different reasons.

Do you mind explaining your reasons please?

1. Starters should be marked in the box score + game time injuries aswell. Perhaps if player was injured DNP - coach decision would change to DNP - Injury etc.
2. Would it be rating? or who scored the most? This is not actually needed imo.
3. I imagine, this would be very hard to implement. Like in real basketball you can't really say who's at fault when zone is involved, or pick and roll defence etc.
4. More info about history is always good.
5. I think this is a bad one. Boosts income a lot for playoff teams.
6. Yes, why not. No actual downside.
7. Yes, why not. Better filter selection.
BTW I must add, bookmark notes are supergreat!!!

Hey,
I am looking for a BB response here.
Just wondering how much code, or how hard is it to change the minimum number of teams required for a PL?
Would it be easy to change the minimum teams required to 2?
I think this would be absolutely fantastic if you could change this easily!
I always want to challenge someone to a match (especially friends) to see whose team is stronger, but have to join a larger PL to do so even though I may not want to play the others.

To everybody: Please don't say that this can be done in a scrimmage because it can't be done without ruining your minutes for gameshape.

I thought it was closed because this thread was open. :S if not, sorry.

Forum rules are at (1592.1). Note the rules about not bumping threads. Opening a new thread because you can't search to find the one you wanted to bump probably qualifies as even worse.

In any case, this is the suggestions forum. Stay on topic, please.

My 10 cents on this:

1: These are visual cues. Makes live a little easier, so...I support this suggestion

2: Why would you want this? My xxxx is better/larger then your xxxx? I don't support this

3: Basketball is a Team game, so the whole team is to blame when an opponent scores. This goes for your suggestion no.2 as well, btw. Again, I don't support this.

4: Makes live easier. I think Arena price and attendance information is one way to get better intel then your competitors. If you're willing to spend more time by checking on their arena prices and attendence, you can get a feel for ther income. More info means better decisions. Posting the info in the Arena page would allow everyone to get this info easily. Are you sure you want to share all this info with your competitors? I don't support this suggestion

5: This would indeed benefit Playoff/Relegation Teams. But it would be a realistic change. I support it. Maybe we could offset the benefits a bit by allowing teams no longer participating to have scrimmages where the ticket sales are spread between both teams. The attendance would off course be not as high as with playoff games, but at least they would get some income (which would be realistic as well).

6: I support this totally

7: I support this one as well