BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Walkover

Walkover

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
173926.5 in reply to 173926.4
Date: 2/8/2011 10:14:35 AM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
83218321
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
+1

I don´t understand the problem of 25-0 and 48 minutes for each player.


If a team starts a game with 2 or less players, the game-result will be 25-0 and not simulated as a normal game. Therefore, if you are the opponent of this team and want one (or more) player(s) to play through the wohle game to get e.g. 48 minutes for training, that doesn't work. That's why in my opinion it would be a lot better to have a substitute-scrimmage-game to get "normal" minutes.

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
This Post:
00
173926.7 in reply to 173926.6
Date: 2/8/2011 10:34:49 AM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
83218321
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
ah ok - I wasn't sure what he meant :-)

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
This Post:
00
173926.8 in reply to 173926.7
Date: 2/8/2011 11:08:25 AM
JMDCeltics
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
33063306
I didn´t explain myself properly:) That´s what i wanted to mean, that is easy to punish to the team who set less than 3 players with a 25-0 final score and even give to the other team players 48 minutes each one. I don´t know why actually only 46 or 43 can be given to these players.
I wanted to support your idea, simulating the game or not, it doesn´t matter a lot if you can get full training.

Thanks GM-Perpete too.

Last edited by jacobomd at 2/8/2011 11:09:42 AM

This Post:
00
173926.9 in reply to 173926.8
Date: 2/8/2011 1:51:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I didn´t explain myself properly:) That´s what i wanted to mean, that is easy to punish to the team who set less than 3 players with a 25-0 final score and even give to the other team players 48 minutes each one. I don´t know why actually only 46 or 43 can be given to these players.


i think the reason why they don't allow it, because it would be great for the winning team.

Imagine the situation at the end of the season, Team X is going to train stamina and so his friend the manager from team Y ask him to forfeit in their scrimmage so that he is 100% sure that his trainees get 48 minutes because they won't injure or foul out.(or the chanche of injury is really low, when a remember a forum entry about a injury in a forfeit match correctly)
At least thats my explanation of it.

Thats why i like to have a replacement scrimmage for it, so only the team with the illegal lineup get punished, while the winning team have the chanche to play a training match to get the minutes like anybody else in his division/league/country.

This Post:
00
173926.10 in reply to 173926.9
Date: 2/8/2011 4:07:05 PM
JMDCeltics
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
33063306
Imagine the situation at the end of the season, Team X is going to train stamina and so his friend the manager from team Y ask him to forfeit in their scrimmage so that he is 100% sure that his trainees get 48 minutes because they won't injure or foul out.(or the chanche of injury is really low, when a remember a forum entry about a injury in a forfeit match correctly)
At least thats my explanation of it.

Thats why i like to have a replacement scrimmage for it, so only the team with the illegal lineup get punished, while the winning team have the chanche to play a training match to get the minutes like anybody else in his division/league/country.


I got it, that´s true. And the solution you suggest is a really interesting one to avoid situations as you describe and get all the minutes to train.

Thanks.

From: Dustin
This Post:
00
173926.11 in reply to 173926.10
Date: 2/12/2011 5:30:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
I agree with this idea, because it is not fair for the team which is playing in a legal way and then this team doesn´t get the 48 minutes.
I hope that BB will find a solution for this problem.
For example: In my league are two teams which has only one player, so I have two games with 25-0 win but not the hole minutes.

From: Jochen
This Post:
00
173926.12 in reply to 173926.11
Date: 2/13/2011 2:55:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Hey guys, I support you and your idea, because it is a shame that some one only have 3 or less players and are not interestest to play a normal game.
I think that teams with 3 or less players shouldn´t get money. Only a team which is interested in playing normal games should get money.