BuzzerBeater Forums

Non-BB Global (English) > Alber Pujols Poll

Alber Pujols Poll

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
199688.5 in reply to 199688.4
Date: 10/30/2011 6:57:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
because a) cancer b) USA USA USA

This Post:
00
199688.6 in reply to 199688.4
Date: 11/3/2011 12:52:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
No free pass for Armstrong here. A guy who cheats to win isnt doing USA any favors. Thats not even the biggest D-Bag move from Armstrong either.

Pujols is awesome, great hitter and all. I have a hard time thinking of him as the best player in baseball, as I hear on ESPN often and elsewhere as well. The guy is a big fat first baseman. To me the best player is someone who hits, fields, runs, does it all. Winning a gold glove at 1st isnt the same as winning it at 3rd, ss or CF. If you were a GM and all of the players were dumped into a draft pool, would you really take Pujols 1st? Lots of hard hitting 1st baseman out there.

This Post:
00
199688.7 in reply to 199688.6
Date: 11/3/2011 4:50:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
The guy is a big fat first baseman. To me the best player is someone who hits, fields, runs, does it all. Winning a gold glove at 1st isnt the same as winning it at 3rd, ss or CF.


In his younger years, Ruth was a great athlete -- even pitched. But certainly throughout most of his career he was on the heavy side. So no love of the Babe from you either?



Last edited by Solana_Steve at 11/3/2011 5:08:29 PM

This Post:
00
199688.8 in reply to 199688.7
Date: 11/3/2011 7:32:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Im one of those-'Babe was awesome, probably saved the game, but his game wouldnt have hed up in today's game' kind of guy. Think Adam Dunn only........not that healthy.

John Goodman is awesome as the Babe in that movie. Great American Character.

This Post:
00
199688.9 in reply to 199688.8
Date: 11/4/2011 3:49:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Its very hard to compare players from different eras. Ruth was clearly the best player of his time and he changed baseball and ended the dead ball era and style of play.

If you put Babe Ruth in a time machine and transported him to today, I agree, he might not do particularly well against the modern athlete.

But if he was a 25 year old growing up with all the advantages of the modern time period, would he be competitive? A star? An MVP? Really hard to say...



This Post:
11
199688.10 in reply to 199688.9
Date: 11/4/2011 4:16:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Agreed. However in the case of Ruth, who was an extremely compulsive person who didnt listen to anyone or do what he was told unless he wanted to, the whole 'if he had grown up now' doesnt seem to apply. I am sure that many great atheletes from then could have been able to do it now with modern training etc. In Ruth's case though, I think he had his best shot then and wouldnt have made it now, not with his antics and ...........freewill.

This Post:
00
199688.11 in reply to 199688.4
Date: 11/5/2011 10:46:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
btw, MLB has banned HGH but they don't run blood tests for it due to objections from the players union (for other reasons)

This Post:
00
199688.12 in reply to 199688.11
Date: 11/5/2011 2:00:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Why would the players union object I wonder? Big bucks always trumps right and wrong.

This Post:
00
199688.13 in reply to 199688.12
Date: 11/5/2011 7:26:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Regular blood testing would be a fairly unprecedented invasion of privacy

This Post:
00
199688.14 in reply to 199688.13
Date: 11/5/2011 11:46:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Drug testing as a condition of employment is not unheard of. Adherence to league rules and policies is a condition in every major league contract.

This Post:
00
199688.15 in reply to 199688.14
Date: 11/6/2011 12:58:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Players are already drug tested. Blood testinog, however, is abnormal as a condition of employment, and it raises a great deal of legitimate privacy questions.

Advertisement