BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > How really works the 2-3 zone...

How really works the 2-3 zone...

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
204834.5 in reply to 204834.4
Date: 12/20/2011 7:13:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
never loked that close where my sf and the c was defending, but could also imagine a high rotation in the zones implemented.

Don't think that the c just stands there, and at least charles comment go to a lot help defence in it which need blocking here and would be your double teams.

This Post:
00
204834.6 in reply to 204834.5
Date: 12/20/2011 7:26:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
483483
never loked that close where my sf and the c was defending, but could also imagine a high rotation in the zones implemented.

Don't think that the c just stands there, and at least charles comment go to a lot help defence in it which need blocking here and would be your double teams.

The C don't stands there all time because it's illegal! XDDD crazy defensive 3 seconds violation, you know.
So the C does all work, cutting inside pass line (needs OD), help defense for mid-range shots (need shot blocking), and of course, needs awesome inside defense... Only few players in BB can do this at same time.

This Post:
00
204834.7 in reply to 204834.6
Date: 12/20/2011 7:28:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
the thread start make the thesis that the c just do it currently, i never looked so much for it. Also i don't think he primary defends the high post.

Not really watch out so much for it, but i remember him defending midrange jumpers quite often(not sure if central or baseline).

Last edited by CrazyEye at 12/20/2011 7:28:40 AM

This Post:
00
204834.8 in reply to 204834.7
Date: 12/20/2011 8:01:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
483483
the thread start make the thesis that the c just do it currently, i never looked so much for it. Also i don't think he primary defends the high post.

Not really watch out so much for it, but i remember him defending midrange jumpers quite often(not sure if central or baseline).

Really, I'm being too much emphatic than how I wanna be with this theme. I don't really use the 2-3 because don't work correctly, or it's to much difficult to use properly than the 3-2 for example. Only try to be open-mind because this theme is "trending topic" in BB forums since much time ago... and I only suggest the implementation of a new tactic or the correct of old 2-3. In all cases, thanks for read and write. Greetings.

This Post:
11
204834.9 in reply to 204834.8
Date: 12/20/2011 8:07:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
for me it had work, and i doesn't have those blocking moster but quite nice OD at the bigs, which might be the other key then blocking for it(i even think OD is quite good for big also in man to man).

The downside of this tactic is, that it is definately not working when the opposition isn't playing inside while a 3-2 Zone isn't good against an inside attack but at least didn't screw you.

This Post:
11
204834.11 in reply to 204834.10
Date: 12/23/2011 8:16:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Syracuse 2-3 Zone.

(one side) SF pops out to defend perimeter when needed.

(other side) PF stays closer to basket, G slides to wing when necessary. other G and SF rotate over and out.

(middle) C protects basket.

This Post:
00
204834.12 in reply to 204834.11
Date: 12/24/2011 6:22:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
You just use the wrong players if 2-3 wont work for you.

This Post:
00
204834.13 in reply to 204834.12
Date: 2/27/2012 4:34:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Syracuse plays a 2-3 thats long enough to where it functions almost as a hybrid 3-2.

The problem with the 2-1-2 as you called it, is the corners and baselines. the 2-3 gives up that mid-range jumper because its a low percentage shot, particularly at the NCAA level, in exchange for traps and contested shots in the corner.