BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > SF training

SF training

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Yuck

This Post:
00
242735.5 in reply to 242735.3
Date: 6/9/2013 11:09:31 PM
Cassville Yuck
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
553553
Second Team:
Yuckville Cass
I totally understand what you are saying Manon. You and I have had very meaningful dialougue in the past. What I am proposing shouldn't make it infinitely easier to train a sf if the training percentages allotted are equivalent. The biggest pain is how the rest of your team is built for training a sf. Under current rules it benefits a team that already has a sf and not teams trying to build their first. If you already have a stud sf, it is much easier to train his replacement than it would be to start from scratch.

Last edited by Yuck at 6/9/2013 11:12:16 PM

From: Bballin

To: Yuck
This Post:
33
242735.6 in reply to 242735.1
Date: 6/10/2013 12:04:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
What if a one position training at the SF position trained something like 35% OD, 35% ID, 20% SB and 10% Cross training. That seems fair in my mind.

From: Yuck

This Post:
00
242735.7 in reply to 242735.6
Date: 6/10/2013 12:10:06 AM
Cassville Yuck
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
553553
Second Team:
Yuckville Cass
That's pretty much what I had in mind. Maybe less on the secondary but either way, that's the idea.

From: E.B.W.

This Post:
00
242735.8 in reply to 242735.6
Date: 6/10/2013 12:10:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
I would be okay with that, but 40% OD, 40% ID, 10% SB and 10% CT. What is it when you train pressure right now? Does 80% go to OD or is it less than that?

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
From: Flamen

To: Yuck
This Post:
00
242735.9 in reply to 242735.1
Date: 6/10/2013 7:56:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
It would be nice if and only if it was less efficient than training it separately.

Just like js for forwards is less efficient that training js for guards and inside shot separately.