BuzzerBeater Forums

+1. I like that idea!

I like the changes the BBs have made, with the exception of the extended transfer listing of players on a Supporter's team. This is a bit biased, but it gives the Supporters an advantage. Oh well :)

One thing that myself and others in the community have voiced that they would like the salary formula for JR to be tweaked to a more affordable level. I believe that if the JR formula was lowered to a generally affordable price, the current LI dominance would be weakened, and tactical diversity would increase.

All in all changes are in the right way, with a big question mark on the shotblocking change and GS drops for NT players.

Main reason is that we don't have clarification about how SB change is designed to work, therefore drawing conclusions, even after a considerable amount of games, might be tricky and actual feedback on the subject faulty.

The questions risen on the subject are:
* will it only contribute in more shots blocked in a game?
*if a team has good shotblocking bigs, the opposing bigs getting blocked early in the game, will resort to shooting mid range more or not?
* if a team has good shotblocking bigs, will this contribute to an inside focused offensive team taking more 3s than "normal"?

I believe, that if the answer is yes only in the first question, then BB would be better leaving SB as it was and tweaking instead the effectiveness of JR.

On the GS drop, i think NT players in leagues of countries in the same group as their native one , should somehow be immune to such drops when transfered, in order to prevent existent foul plays.


Last edited by maddoghellas at 6/20/2013 3:12:09 AM

Even if it would not be possible to train game shape training would still not really be worth the effort. So to remove Game Shape training is the least I expect to be implemented for coming season to promote training.

It is really boring to play in highest division and even if I manage to get my minutes for the training by sacrificing playing with best team it is not enough as punishment for skipping game shape training. You also need to be punished by having ½-1 level poorer game shape despite playing your starters fewer minutes a week.

I wouldn't really say it's an advantage, I mean, most players only really get bid on in the last few hours anyways. I see it being more for like low pot/cheap players that you may have to list a few times if you are really set on selling and not firing.

I like the changes the BBs have made, with the exception of the extended transfer listing of players on a Supporter's team. This is a bit biased, but it gives the Supporters an advantage. Oh well :)

No it doesn't it. It just saves the supporter time of re-listing a player that it tough to sell. More convenient, sure, but advantage, no.

Last edited by Coolbobj at 6/20/2013 11:23:22 AM

I think that lifting some restrictions on training would make it more interesting
Why can't SG be one position training for OD and PASS?
Why can't PF train ID or IS
how about single position training on anything for SF

Last edited by Headless T Gunner at 6/20/2013 12:04:23 PM

agreed



To Patrick,

Hi, congrats on 24 ssns!

Ok lets get to business here. I personally like the changes, but I'd like to give a f
few suggestions

Suggestion #1: Give heavier consequences to forfeit people. Yes I like the idea of moving their draft position down 1 but what is that going to do? They can always use their tank money to go and get a beast trainee off the market. So here's what I would suggest to be implemented:

Every time a team forfeits, a % of money is taken from their account. So lets say they forfeit once, yea they could've made a mistake or real life got in the way so lets just put 15% for that forfeit (the average D2+ team gets like what, 500k in attendance, so if thats the case the team would lose $75,000) . But if they do it again lets give them a heavier amount of money taken (lets say 25%) and heavier and heavier for the forfeiting team. We could have a linear Forfeiting effect.

Forfeit 1: 15%
Forfet 2: 25%
Forfeit 3: 35%
Forfeit 4: 50%
Forfeit 5: 60%
Forfeit 6: 70%
Forfeit 7: 80%
Forfeits higher then 7: 80%

You guys get what I'm doing here right? Ok lets go to suggestion #2


Suggestion #2: More money for the cup accomplishments. I know it's the pain in the bum after you win the cup, becuase you only get 300k! 300k doesn't get you nowhere in terms of paying salaries and such, so I'd like more money to be given out in the cup tournament, because the team won they earned it imo. So lets try and work out something, like this

(If you win the round)

Cup Final: $1,000,000
Semi-Final: $750,000
Quarter-Final: $500,000
16 Team Rd: $300,000
32 Team Rd: $200,000
64 Team Rd: $150,000
128 Team Rd: $100,000
256 Team Rd: $75,000
512 Team Rd: $60,000
All Lower Rounds: $50,000


Ok the prices may not sound reasonable but how about we people work it out and discuss it?

tough

it alright, constructive criticism ;)


but imo draft srsly? Not many people invest in the draft, so they use their money from tanking on buying super beast draftees on the market.


Draft is already a crapshoot thats why I did suggestion 1.