BuzzerBeater | BuzzerBeater Forums | Help - English > Another who do I pick first question

BuzzerBeater

	BuzzerBeater Forums
	Help - English > Another who do I pick first question

Help - English

Player Salaries Floor 2

Train Draft Pick 3

Preseason training 14

Tax and salaries 3

Losing Team got promoted? 5

Overextension Tax 3

Another who do I pick first qu... 15

Updated engine player skills 21

Stamina 5

Players sold in last 14 weeks ... 1

Draft help 7

Elastic effect : IS or ID or S... 13

Offseason schedule s62-->s63 1

Staff: Doc and other stuff abo... 13

3-2 vs M2M 6

pressure 2

Salary Question 2

Player roles 3

Same weekly skills and positio... 2

< >

Favorite Folders

Another who do I pick first question

Set priority

Show messages by

Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)

From: gockun

To: gockun

This Post:

321775.5 in reply to 321775.3
Date: 11/27/2023 13:02:01

sheert devils

III.9

Overall Posts Rated:

Second Team:

sheert devils II

:D here is my consecutive disappointing 19 years old 5/5 A+ draftee. Predraft evaluation is still a joke. it should based on TSP not merely on salary

Weekly salary: $ 4 552
Role: draws a paycheck
DMI: 0
Age: 19 Rookie
Height: 6'3" / 190 cm
Potential: MVP
Game Shape: respectable
Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: strong
Outside Def.: mediocre Handling: inept
Driving: awful Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: inept Inside Def.: average
Rebounding: inept Shot Blocking: mediocre
Stamina: pitiful Free Throw: strong

Experience: pitiful TSP: 55 (36 + 19)

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: LA-flaterik123

To: gockun

This Post:

321775.6 in reply to 321775.5
Date: 11/27/2023 13:41:45

NakamichiDragons

II.4

Overall Posts Rated:

1881

Second Team:

Little Computer People

MVP … and not really ugly.
1 Season handling will give him about 18-20 Ups in Drive, Handling and some secondary and usually cross training.

founded in S3 IV.5 (34234) - returned in S28 IV.7 (34515)

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: gockun

To: LA-flaterik123

This Post:

321775.7 in reply to 321775.6
Date: 11/27/2023 13:48:46

sheert devils

III.9

Overall Posts Rated:

Second Team:

sheert devils II

come on man, he is ugly. he does not deserve the rating of A+ and even not sure about 5 star rating too. with your training suggestion every player can be trained to a valid degree, that is not the point here.

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: gockun

To: gockun

This Post:

321775.8 in reply to 321775.7
Date: 11/27/2023 13:57:58

sheert devils

III.9

Overall Posts Rated:

Second Team:

sheert devils II

by the way, he was rated as A not A+, I was mistaken there. still my argument stands. this player (52712418) was also in my draft and he was listed as A-, this one is better than my draftee but according to predraft evaluation he is not

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: LA-flaterik123

To: gockun

This Post:

321775.9 in reply to 321775.8
Date: 11/27/2023 14:15:36

NakamichiDragons

II.4

Overall Posts Rated:

1881

Second Team:

Little Computer People

High sub-skills 🤷‍♂️

founded in S3 IV.5 (34234) - returned in S28 IV.7 (34515)

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: Bonaro 72

This Post:

321775.10 in reply to 321775.9
Date: 11/27/2023 14:27:00

Andamana Harimaguada

IV.21

Overall Posts Rated:

Not a bad player at all, with the right training will becomea quite decent.
Maybe not for a 1st pick, but its lottery in the end.

Last edited by Bonaro 72 at 11/27/2023 14:27:18

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: LA-flaterik123

To: Bonaro 72

This Post:

321775.11 in reply to 321775.10
Date: 11/27/2023 14:45:21

NakamichiDragons

II.4

Overall Posts Rated:

1881

Second Team:

Little Computer People

As I said … and yes! 😉

founded in S3 IV.5 (34234) - returned in S28 IV.7 (34515)

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: gockun

To: Bonaro 72

This Post:

321775.12 in reply to 321775.10
Date: 11/27/2023 14:54:29

sheert devils

III.9

Overall Posts Rated:

Second Team:

sheert devils II

as I said before training is not the point here. No experienced user go and look for this player second time if was in the TL. he doesn't deserve to be graded as A or 5 star player. I think there is something inherently wrong about predraft evaluation. And honestly all your answers was not about it but how traing would make this player "good". Training would make all garbage players good. That is not the point here

Last edited by gockun at 11/27/2023 15:13:06

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: Bonaro 72

To: gockun

This Post:

321775.13 in reply to 321775.12
Date: 11/27/2023 15:24:16

Andamana Harimaguada

IV.21

Overall Posts Rated:

Partly I agree with you, there's no big difference between bad and good players in the draft, the real point that gives the value is the potential.

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: boule

To: gockun

This Post:

321775.14 in reply to 321775.12
Date: 11/28/2023 02:32:18

Boulettes

II.3

Overall Posts Rated:

2035

Second Team:

Les Boulettes Utopiennes

This is why if i want to know the skills, i do pay draft points for seeing them. I do not base my choice on A or A+.

I understand you're upset, i was sometimes and choose to discover the skills rather than choosing only on 5/5 A+.

The salary rule rules, and you have tools to see more of your potential draftees.

Mark Unread Ignore User

From: gockun

To: boule

This Post:

321775.15 in reply to 321775.14
Date: 11/28/2023 11:19:05

sheert devils

III.9

Overall Posts Rated:

Second Team:

sheert devils II

yeah true, fair enough.

Mark Unread Ignore User

Disable Emoticons and Images