BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Suggestions

Suggestions

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
77
323432.5 in reply to 323432.4
Date: 4/6/2024 3:20:01 AM
Durham Wasps
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
I'm completely against seedings in the Cup in any form.

From: Felien
This Post:
00
323432.9 in reply to 323432.8
Date: 4/8/2024 12:15:31 PM
Botafogo B. C.
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
00
The Star palyer, the idea is great but they don't give any real plus and market in low - low mid level players is all over the place. I also recive 2 players from the same positions, so not even for reserv one of them is ok.



About the cup, removing BOTs fast is also a way to improve small coutries. The cup is simples, 50.000 or 0 money. Every time a bot pass you remove money from players. And is just a fair choise you have the best rank teams paly against then. Not only for those teams but also for competition in general. If you want to have a seed system or not is ok, i just talking about BOTs now. BOT vs player should be first than player vs player.



In Infra is just a way to have more teams training better players fast, also help the market in every aspect. In Hattrick for an example.

On my first week i can easy have 84% efficiency (no forcing to get 100%, but if i want i could reach, in a decent way)
The end of my first season, i can be on 100%.

BuzzerBeater well, I need a decent RNG, to find a level 4+ coach. (5+ with week reajust, is almost impossible and Max coach is a no go zone).Plus Infr, Plus other coach.

Small nations suffer a lot from that, a player that can help a NT will take a long time be able to help. Also you lost a lot of lv 9+ players because of low training speed.



This Post:
00
323432.11 in reply to 323432.10
Date: 4/8/2024 3:29:12 PM
Súria Lakers
IV.15
Overall Posts Rated:
33443344
Second Team:
Súria Lakers II
Players are already trained so much faster than before than we are breaking TSP records and average TSP every season. Faster training will just result in need of better players to get against the better players of the other teams. Rinse and repeat.


Does GMs or BBs know who's the player with the most TSP?

PKT desde la Temporada 4



Para ver la imagen en mayor tamaño:
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDhxMLDX/e3700169252f336ab3c187ad4773...)
This Post:
00
323432.13 in reply to 323432.12
Date: 4/8/2024 4:41:29 PM
Súria Lakers
IV.15
Overall Posts Rated:
33443344
Second Team:
Súria Lakers II
BBs surely do. At least if they want to.


I wonder if somehow this info could be available for everyone! I mean, at least know what the highest TSP is, without giving the player's name, of course.
It would be awesome!


Top teams are getting better. Training is getting better. Heck, even draftees are getting better. We are at a point where people are asking for another shave off top salaries because the reason to stop training is not cap anymore, but salary.


You are completely right on that. Each "adjustment" is to make training even easier.

PKT desde la Temporada 4



Para ver la imagen en mayor tamaño:
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDhxMLDX/e3700169252f336ab3c187ad4773...)
From: Bernspin

This Post:
22
323432.15 in reply to 323432.1
Date: 4/11/2024 10:28:41 AM
Franca Shoemakers Revival
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
561561
Second Team:
Mito só o da Caverna


1- Cup

The Cup can be a important income for some teams strategy and is a important way to know you team potential. For an example in the Brazil Cup in round 3, we have already clash from 2 div 1 team, while we have div 3 teams playing against true bots. This makes no sense. I'm not against some lucky rng but having those types of games in the same round is a really bad tournament desing.

Before allow this types of games, better rank teams should have preference to play against bots teams.




If better ranked teams have preference to play against bots this will hurt weaker teams...

Div 2 x Div 1 while Div 3 x BOT is what makes it possible for Div 3 & 4 to make long runs in the cup, otherwise the cup would be more exclusive for Div 1 & 2 then it already is.