BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > All Star Game Rosters

All Star Game Rosters

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
36638.5 in reply to 36638.4
Date: 6/23/2008 2:47:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You're right. They do that more for the larger roster sports but I still think it would be a good idea and make the ASG interesting for more than six teams per league.

This Post:
00
36638.6 in reply to 36638.5
Date: 6/23/2008 2:48:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
You're right. They do that more for the larger roster sports but I still think it would be a good idea and make the ASG interesting for more than six teams per league.


I don't really agree, but I don't vehemently disagree either.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36638.7 in reply to 36638.6
Date: 6/23/2008 2:54:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Honestly, it is not a huge deal to me either. But I know that I'm not going to be watching the ASG or even realy looking at the boxscore, mostly because I don't have anyone playing. My guess is that is the case for most people w/o a player selected.

From: Debaser
This Post:
00
36638.9 in reply to 36638.8
Date: 7/4/2008 10:08:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
No way. The ASG should be a reward for the best players of the division, regardless of what team they play for. Otherwise there's no reason to celebrate an All Star Game. Please, keep working to improve the selection system, that's all we need.

From: Debaser

This Post:
00
36638.10 in reply to 36638.1
Date: 7/4/2008 10:14:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I completely agree with you, dhoff. Listing every player most outstanding statistics seems to be a much more logical option than displaying their respective DMIs, which fails to portray a player's real value very oftenly. By showing his stats, we can compare a player with the other ASG participants, and also with those who didn't make it into the list.

Good suggestion, IMHO.

This Post:
00
36638.11 in reply to 36638.10
Date: 7/5/2008 12:33:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
is the all-star voting based on fans who go an watch on my home games? if not, would that be a good option to base the votes on players who they want to play?

...this may result in giving importance to expand arenas... other than generating income itself.

This Post:
00
36638.12 in reply to 36638.11
Date: 7/7/2008 2:22:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
is the all-star voting based on fans who go an watch on my home games? if not, would that be a good option to base the votes on players who they want to play?

...this may result in giving importance to expand arenas... other than generating income itself.


Attendance DOES impact ASG voting.

Last edited by Edju at 7/7/2008 2:22:07 AM

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36638.13 in reply to 36638.12
Date: 7/7/2008 3:28:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Sure? Because our must succesfull and most visited teams, doN't had a all star in its rooster.

This Post:
00
36638.14 in reply to 36638.13
Date: 7/7/2008 9:56:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Positive.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36638.15 in reply to 36638.13
Date: 7/9/2008 9:14:17 AM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
Yes, sure, I read it too. The attendance slightly influence the votes.

Advertisement