BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > NT players and Wages

NT players and Wages

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
9917.5 in reply to 9917.4
Date: 12/13/2007 9:36:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
279279
True.

And an other example :

Actually i'm traing Jumpshot for PG and SG.

So i have buy only 18 y/o because it's faster..

But i have a 22 years old SG, NT player of Tounes. I'm training too but it's slow..

So, team who got older player than they could have ( 22 for exempale instead 18 y/o ) it make more difficulty for the team, but it's better for the National team.

We can have somes advantages of that ( like reducing wages )

This Post:
00
9917.6 in reply to 9917.5
Date: 12/16/2007 7:06:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I think a good idea for the short term is that the NT should compensate wages of any player injured during a NT match, while if the player is fit then the club should pay the salary. At least the salaries aren't too high yet but thats not really the point, just because the average player on a NT isn't as good now as they will be in 2-3 years doesn't mean we shouldn't be compensated now.

I have two players in our NT and I would be frustrated if I had to pay them full salary while they are injured because of a NT match, I don't see why my club should have to suffer because of that but I guess thats just one of the downsides about having NT players atm.

Now that I said that I bet one of my players gets injured this week lol.