BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Supporter saved search

Supporter saved search

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
114574.50 in reply to 114574.49
Date: 12/27/2009 5:59:39 PM
Molson Canadians
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Those give me the following player (2805590), who is Canadian and has a 30k salary.

So, the problem isn't a bug, it's the intended (but perhaps incorrectly so) behavior. The search looks for players whose current bid is between 60% and 80% of your available funds (money - bids). So, it's not that there are no players in the desired range -- rather, unless you specify a bid price range it's going to look only within the 60-80%, and there didn't happen to be any players *there*.

I've run a check, and there happen to be 0 players with those criteria in your 60% - 80% range.

This Post:
00
114574.51 in reply to 114574.50
Date: 12/27/2009 6:07:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
So, the problem isn't a bug, it's the intended (but perhaps incorrectly so) behavior. The search looks for players whose current bid is between 60% and 80% of your available funds (money - bids).


If you keep it that way, then I think it would be wise to present this information clearly somewhere to the end user. There's no way I would have expected it to only consider that range by default... from the outside, it appears badly broken.

I personally don't think you should keep it that way. Anything up to 100% sounds reasonable to me, with the nearest expiring auction being presented when there are multiple matches. Actually, maybe any match at all regardless of cost, perhaps with a toggle in the preferences for suppressing players you can't currently afford. But I'm not your Product Manager.

This Post:
00
114574.52 in reply to 114574.51
Date: 12/27/2009 6:10:34 PM
Molson Canadians
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Thanks for the advice. I think I may have a potential solution, but I'll need to test it out first to make sure it scales.