BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
93604.501 in reply to 93604.498
Date: 8/1/2009 4:27:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Once again, when both team have no defense, you can pretty much toss a coin about the win. In this particular game, your defense without a zone at home is almost as bad as his, with the wrong zone, away.



Cortacesped defended really bad with the zone 1-3-1 in compare with his man to man, by the way David was playing at home.

What i think is that with the old game engine, most sure is that he would win this game by +20 or so regarding to a bad choice by the opponnent using a 1-3-1 but i also cant understand why he lost by such a difference.

There is really 0 sense in this new GE, it remembers me to the first game of the season, lot of matches seems to be really at random.

This Post:
00
93604.502 in reply to 93604.498
Date: 8/1/2009 4:29:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
107107
Both defenses are bad but i think he defended worst than me,. I also had advantages in the field. I can understand to launch a coin to see who wins, but losing 19 seems excessive

This Post:
00
93604.503 in reply to 93604.502
Date: 8/1/2009 4:42:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
Both defenses are bad but i think he defended worst than me
Both defenses are bad enough for this to matter very little.

I also had advantages in the field.
What advantage? Against the strong attack, both defenses were equally horrible. Against the weak attack, your opponent's defense was vastly superior.

All in all, a little out of the ordinary, but nothing particularly upsetting in this game.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.504 in reply to 93604.501
Date: 8/1/2009 4:44:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
but i also cant understand why he lost by such a difference.

Because a great OD counts for something, even when the opposition is playing Look Inside.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.505 in reply to 93604.503
Date: 8/1/2009 4:56:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
107107
you mean that it is best to put a 1-3-1 defense and fail, rather than a man to man and "half wrong"?

I thought that this new engine was going to hamper the defense area, and needed good defenders at every position, but still fail by far the defense, is better than man to man ...

This Post:
00
93604.506 in reply to 93604.505
Date: 8/1/2009 5:00:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
you mean that it is best to put a 1-3-1 defense and fail, rather than a man to man and "half wrong"?

I thought that this new engine was going to hamper the defense area, and needed good defenders at every position, but still fail by far the defense, is better than man to man ...

No, it's best to actually have defense. You have none, anywhere.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.508 in reply to 93604.507
Date: 8/1/2009 5:27:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
You played Low Post and your guards combined for 49 of your 100 shots -- judging by the PP100 for your guards, these were mostly god-awful shots.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.509 in reply to 93604.506
Date: 8/1/2009 5:29:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
107107
Ok thanks, I think I understand what you mean. My message did not complain of having lost, but I do not understand how the zone defense (and I do not understand)

This Post:
00
93604.510 in reply to 93604.509
Date: 8/1/2009 5:38:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
Ok thanks, I think I understand what you mean. My message did not complain of having lost, but I do not understand how the zone defense (and I do not understand)

Think about it this way: even though he picked the wrong zone, the individual defensive skills of his players were enough to slow you down.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
93604.511 in reply to 93604.510
Date: 8/1/2009 5:51:36 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Ok thanks, I think I understand what you mean. My message did not complain of having lost, but I do not understand how the zone defense (and I do not understand)

Think about it this way: even though he picked the wrong zone, the individual defensive skills of his players were enough to slow you down.


In this case you will never see where and when change your players cause you will never know if you've lost due to random or because your players are really weaker than the others. As I've written somewhere the zone defense should have relevance in the final result of a match, soon everyone will play m2m...

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
Advertisement