BuzzerBeater Forums

I agree. I didn't say five. I gave an example of two. Two $150,000 players, a bunch of $100,000 players and a great bench is easily affordable in the top leagues. I don't train to gain money but what a lot of people do is train three players but once the training is finished sell one or two and keep the best one or two. So your training is to create your own great player and the profit from the other players is just gravy.

You also don't seem to acknowledge that the $150,000 player you have been training was probably only paid $100,000 over the least season in effect giving you $50,000 of free talent at the business end of the season. Then if you sell him at the start of the new season you have has a guy who performed like a $150,000 player for the playoffs, who you paid $100,000 a week and now having paid his $150,000 wage once you can sell him for a fortune (if young and properly trained).

I would assume that most good trainers would do the final blasting of the primaries in the last season of training and it is easy to make the salaries explode.

A PF with wondrous JS, IS, ID and RE and strong in everything else has a salary of $104,000. Get him just six pops in his last season of training, two in each inside skill and his salary explodes to $198,000. Would it be nice to have a $198,000 PF in the finals who you are paying $104,000?

Get him just six pops in his last season of training, two in each inside skill and his salary explodes to $198,000.

That is exactly how you ruin a completely good player. Training him to 198k with no big gain is pointless. You'd have to sell him, as he is not salary efficiant after that one season. I'd rather train someone else on the team, or go for GS/FT/ST training.

Why would you ever want to train a player into 150-200k range? That's bad management.

Yeah, stupid NT requirements...

Now there's a question. Are you playing for NT or your own team. If you want the NT bonus, get your SF into NT or buy small country NT players. It's obvious you can't hold a big countrys NT player and still be salary effective.
Why are we even discussing this:) I don't have to teach you to play. Crappy offtopic.

Yes I have seen B3 teams that are heavily on the minus side per week. Depending on the NT bonus merc, ofcourse you can have more salarys, as it comes back as merc. If you gain more income, you can dump that into more salarys. But again you can't have 5 NT players as starters and still train them all.

Yes I have seen B3 teams that are heavily on the minus side per week. Depending on the NT bonus merc, ofcourse you can have more salarys, as it comes back as merc. If you gain more income, you can dump that into more salarys. But again you can't have 5 NT players as starters and still train them all.

but also some make money and still had the players ;)

It's obvious you can't hold a big countrys NT player and still be salary effective.

Just because of bad game design. If we had a better salary formula those problems would not exist.

Now there's a question. Are you playing for NT or your own team. If you want the NT bonus, get your SF into NT or buy small country NT players. It's obvious you can't hold a big countrys NT player and still be salary effective.
Why are we even discussing this:) I don't have to teach you to play. Crappy offtopic.

listen kids, uncle Kukok is tellin fairy tales again..take ur seat and be quiet :-D

Cheers

Well, honestly in most professional sports, Teams having several BIG TIME national players will most of the time make quite a solid loss. There´s only a handful examples (FC Bayern in Football p.e.) who manage to actually make profit although having a team stacked with team players, usually (FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Chelsea...) teams make severe losses.

It´s not that different in other sports.