BuzzerBeater Forums

I see soem salary descrepencies between teams here. I coudl look more in depth I suppose. At teh end of the day these are 4th~10th place, or worse in teh scheme of the BB3. These are not examples of alternate strategies being successfull in the entirety of the BB3 process, these are examples of teams in the mix and FAILING to get into the final rounds. All the teams that did make it to the final rounds played LI, MtM including the winner. ACROSS the bored and after your post someone shows the BB3 winner LOSING when NOT using LI MtM. So my point made ever the more clearer.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH,this post is just ridicoulous

I just showed you that with similar ratings LI MtM a lot of times lose against outside tactics also when LI MtM is played by good teams(to reach knockout round stage of B3 they had to be good teams);again to explain the success of LI MtM in the final stages of B3 we have to come back to the market and to the fact that is easier and cheaper strengthen the teams for short period of time buying big mans

Also the game where Hostivar lose in PL,he had much lower ratings than Secret Agents,and this again agree with what I am saying...

P.S. if you want to talk about salary discrepances,you should look at this game of B3,Knockout Rounds (32383095) where LI MtM was almost losing against a so not efficient tactic with an enormous discrepancy in salaries,and in ratings

Maybe you haven't realized yet that with the right kind of guards you can win with any kind of strategy,not only with LI MtM.
LI MtM is a good tactic,but doesn't mean automatically a win,and it has some relevant flows that you don't even look at in your analysis(???)

(32727399)

(32727401)

Chicago Bulls used RnG MtM first game and LI 3-2 second game to take the NBBA crown.

So that's a little different I guess.

Last edited by Eminence Front at 4/17/2011 10:24:48 PM

Would you consider this an example of some what a balance of between outside and inside strategies?
(32422685)