BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
67212.53 in reply to 67212.50
Date: 1/6/2009 12:01:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I have to continue - only thing which I would like to see in the training is an option for the training PG/SG/SF Passing at once. That would be really kind thing from developers, while it would be faster only for a 1/4 than a team training, but I guess that 3-phase training is normally somehow faster for a 1/4.

From: brian

This Post:
00
67212.54 in reply to 67212.47
Date: 1/6/2009 12:18:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
You can already single position train every other position in something (except PF, which are nicely bundled with center anyways).

Why should SF be excluded?

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
67212.55 in reply to 67212.54
Date: 1/6/2009 12:31:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Using your own logic PF has no single position training why should SF have one?
PG and C have the most single position trainings and SG has ONE! I would like my PF to have JS training but I have to play him out of position for that also as I want them to shoot ok also. The training system at the moment favors edges as it seems and that's how it should be. Easy to train PG, C a little harder to train SG,PF and hard to train the overall guy SF.

From: brian

This Post:
00
67212.56 in reply to 67212.55
Date: 1/6/2009 12:36:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Using your own logic PF has no single position training why should SF have one?


Because, as I mentioned and you've ignored, PF training is nicely bundled with center training.

I would like my PF to have JS training but I have to play him out of position for that also as I want them to shoot ok also.


Jump Shot for forwards, you're not paying attention to all the training options out there.

The training system at the moment favors edges as it seems and that's how it should be


In your humble, yet not completely informed, opinion right?

This proposal is about defense. SF's need both. But you can't bundle SF training with even two position training, only three position. Yep, you can't even do OD for wingmen, or ID for forwards. Defense is kinda important too, it shouldn't be that hard in the opinion of many of us here.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
67212.57 in reply to 67212.56
Date: 1/6/2009 12:38:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but when you was a PF/C trainer, you have to play your center out of position when you train JS ...

Even for many other kinds of training you need to do that.

From: brian

This Post:
00
67212.58 in reply to 67212.57
Date: 1/6/2009 12:40:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Why would I train jump shot for my center?

Even if, equating jump shot for centers to od/id for small forwards is a poor comparison. They're not even close to each other in importance.

Last edited by brian at 1/6/2009 12:41:24 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
67212.59 in reply to 67212.58
Date: 1/6/2009 12:47:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
because the centers are your others young guys when you train PF and like to that on their normal born position.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
67212.60 in reply to 67212.56
Date: 1/6/2009 12:52:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Because, as I mentioned and you've ignored, PF training is nicely bundled with center training.

Maybe my center is 30 years old and I don't want to train him? I want single position training for PF!
Jump Shot for forwards, you're not paying attention to all the training options out there.

I ment JR here. I made a mistake as I have everything in my national language. Please do not suggest team training here as this is not an option if you even do not like 3 pos training.

I think it would take away SF spot uniqueness if you make him easy(er) to train. I don't want different height 5 SF-s playing the game. There will be lots of PF-s and SG-s playing out of position at SF spot even for the defence.

This Post:
00
67212.62 in reply to 67212.61
Date: 1/6/2009 12:57:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
bi saying he had to play SF when your PF should stay at PF when Jumpshot trainint ;)

From: brian

This Post:
00
67212.63 in reply to 67212.60
Date: 1/6/2009 1:16:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Maybe my center is 30 years old and I don't want to train him? I want single position training for PF!


Sell your center and get a younger one, or play your center at PF, he'll do pretty well there. A SF that needs inside training wont do so well at c/pf, but a center at pf will.

In fact, I'd rather train a 30yo in his right position then train a 19yo out of position. I prefer the game to do its best to mimic reality. What do you prefer, fantasy-land?

I think it would take away SF spot uniqueness if you make him easy(er) to train.


Uniqueness? There's SF's that are guards and SF's that are big men, how unique is that? All that does is force people to play particular tactics.

You prefer a training system that chooses our tactics for us. I prefer one that gives us more options.

You prefer a training system that requires a team to play weaker lineups (in what real world scenario does that EVER happen?). I prefer one that allows players to grow in the position their meant to play in the long run. Look at Michael Jordan playing center so he can work on his post moves!


Last edited by brian at 1/6/2009 1:21:17 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Advertisement