BuzzerBeater Forums

You're right. But, this kind of matches (97151764) is a very good example of my point. And these teams were competing to be the worst team in the league. This behavior turns the game boring.

I'm agree that this kind of matches are boring for every team but the two teams involved. For them can be an awesome match trying to support the other team's points.

This will have been suggested before, but can we have a player +- added to their box score on their player overview pages?

Hi Marin. Here I ask for a very small though important change. We should put a confirmation box when calling a player for the NT. We don't have an app and without a mobile phone version of the BB, so sometimes it is hard to use BB on the phone and in Spain NT and U21 team we have already unintentionally called a random player twice...

I completely agree

Early in the season, when you haven't played that hated rival, the fan survey gives you an "n/a", but it is obviously included in the average rating you get from the fans. All my ratings are 3 1/2 to 5, yet my overall fan satisfaction rating is just 3, and it's affecting my attendance. When there is an "n/a" still on the page it should count as 5 stars, not 0.

What's the impact of changing the automatic logout after a period of "inactivity"? If it's not too much trouble it would really prevent big frustrations. I was just typing an elaborate suggestion, took me 20+ minutes and when I hit send message I get logged out and can't retrieve my message. Happens with longer PM's too.

I know there's a workaround by opening a new tab, logging in again and then send the message in the first tab, but if you forget it before you hit send you're still screwed. Maybe a pop confirmation when you try to communicate with BB while you are logged out would help, there's more possible solutions to this.

Last edited by Jeründerbar at 10/17/2017 5:27:40 AM

I understand that there need to be ways to generate money for BB, but I really think it's not right to do so with features that increase general ease of use like this, and for example searching the forums. I think it's better to generate money by offering cosmetical changes and faster ways to progress in the game (without providing a competitive advantage over others, just paying to get to a specific point quicker).

Maybe that would a good suggestion too, implement micro transactions to generate money. For example, pay to complete the construction of your arena right away. That doesn't provide an absolute advantage over others, and helps with progressing faster.

We could even go further, and enabling paying for training pops, of course for a limited amount of times and within the limits of potential and player market. If someone pays to train a player faster, he wouldn't get an absolute advantage over others and it's something people would pay for I think. It would require some more thorough thinking, but it would be a nicer way to generate money than on ease of use features.

Last edited by Jeründerbar at 10/17/2017 6:51:31 AM

Please, no! Micro transactions it's the worst system and about paying for pops will convert the game in a pay-to-win, even if you limit the amount, two-three pops at big levels it's the difference between win and loose. If you consider that logout has to be all teams maybe I agree but Supporter features never has to be a pay-to-win and never has to include micro transactions.