Your second point is ok, I guess, though Im not sure that the 'best' players being too expensive can really qualify as an anomaly, though I guess that would be good ole semantics again.
You are also not really taking my point to the full extent. I agree, every team can physically purchase the player. But how many teams can run the salary cap that our finalists are running? Every single one? You could afford right now to pay 1m to hire a guy, and 500k-1m salary to pay the guy, and that wouldnt affect you in any way in your league play? Youd still win the title?
Your second point is ok, I guess, though Im not sure that the 'best' players being too expensive can really qualify as an anomaly, though I guess that would be good ole semantics again.they are too expensive on salary (obviously, they're the best ones), but too cheap on the market (and that's not good)I know what you are saying, but umm, in a market like we have in buzzerbeater, where the players set the price by what they bid on, its not really....valid to say that a player is 'too cheap on the market', since the market is open and we set the price. So, I dont know, maybe im the only one, but I just dont see how anyone can go for too cheap on a regular basis. He is going for what hes worth in our current dynamics.
Your second point is ok, I guess, though Im not sure that the 'best' players being too expensive can really qualify as an anomaly, though I guess that would be good ole semantics again.they are too expensive on salary (obviously, they're the best ones), but too cheap on the market (and that's not good)