BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New "Talent" concept.

New "Talent" concept.

Set priority
Show messages by
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
204125.58 in reply to 204125.56
Date: 12/25/2011 4:40:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Yes I have seen B3 teams that are heavily on the minus side per week. Depending on the NT bonus merc, ofcourse you can have more salarys, as it comes back as merc. If you gain more income, you can dump that into more salarys. But again you can't have 5 NT players as starters and still train them all.


but also some make money and still had the players ;)

This Post:
00
204125.59 in reply to 204125.54
Date: 12/25/2011 5:18:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
It's obvious you can't hold a big countrys NT player and still be salary effective.


Just because of bad game design. If we had a better salary formula those problems would not exist.

This Post:
00
204125.60 in reply to 204125.54
Date: 12/25/2011 5:36:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
Now there's a question. Are you playing for NT or your own team. If you want the NT bonus, get your SF into NT or buy small country NT players. It's obvious you can't hold a big countrys NT player and still be salary effective.
Why are we even discussing this:) I don't have to teach you to play. Crappy offtopic.



listen kids, uncle Kukok is tellin fairy tales again..take ur seat and be quiet :-D

Cheers

This Post:
00
204125.61 in reply to 204125.59
Date: 12/25/2011 6:22:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
Well, honestly in most professional sports, Teams having several BIG TIME national players will most of the time make quite a solid loss. There´s only a handful examples (FC Bayern in Football p.e.) who manage to actually make profit although having a team stacked with team players, usually (FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Chelsea...) teams make severe losses.

It´s not that different in other sports.

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
204125.62 in reply to 204125.61
Date: 12/25/2011 6:48:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Well, honestly in most professional sports, Teams having several BIG TIME national players will most of the time make quite a solid loss. There´s only a handful examples (FC Bayern in Football p.e.) who manage to actually make profit although having a team stacked with team players, usually (FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Chelsea...) teams make severe losses.

It´s not that different in other sports.


Its a difference if you cant finance a team of SEVERAL NT players (real world), or if one player is enough to bust your bank (BB).

This Post:
00
204125.63 in reply to 204125.62
Date: 12/25/2011 7:33:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
It is even more stupid that any division II team could afford Lebron but no team besides the Venemous Scorpions could afford Dwight Howard.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
204125.65 in reply to 204125.64
Date: 12/25/2011 3:31:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I think he does not understand, that here, superstars will not take a paycut and go to teams where they can win championships. Here Rashard Lewis (badly trained) demands a 22mil (305k) season salary. A lot of pretty good players demand 13mil per season in NBA. That's about 1/4 of salary cap. If we look at BB top team earnings, the salary cap is around 800+. So a good player in BB is around 200k salary range. You can easily afford D.Howard in this game. D.Howard is demanding 31% of salary cap in the NBA. That's about 248k in BB salary. If you really want to have K.Bryant you have to pay 348k salary. I think it's affordable. You can afford any player in BB right now as a top team. It seems BB does not have anti-steroid rules. So you can actually afford D.Howard on steroids aswell. Is it smart funds management. I think not, but until people stop training those steroid monsters or stop paying their salary, they all will eventually retire and we have a normal game.

Last edited by Kukoc at 12/25/2011 3:32:27 PM

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
204125.66 in reply to 204125.65
Date: 12/25/2011 4:57:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
That is wrong. You are saying Dwight Howard in BB would be 248K but the best big man in BB is Bertas Šeporaitis, salary of 472k and having him on your team would wreck your team and make it uncompetetive. How could you long term afford him and four other good 100k starters and then a decent bench?

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
204125.67 in reply to 204125.66
Date: 12/25/2011 5:53:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
but the best big man in BB is Bertas Šeporaitis, salary of 472k

afford D.Howard on steroids aswell.

472k would be paying someone in the NBA 34mil for a season. Teams can afford that, but managers would prolly just choose not to pay that. In BB it's all about building the best team with your funds. Sure you can take that 472k player, but is he that much better to give up 4x100k salary from other spots on the floor? That's the challenge of this game. Training your brains out on one player, serves no meaning, unless you want to be known as a NT monster trainer. Like I said before, people were training like idiots, that's why they started to adjust salarys compared based on overall player skill levels and introduced cross-training to limit those 2-3 skill trainers.

This Post:
00
204125.68 in reply to 204125.64
Date: 12/25/2011 6:16:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Pleas e do elaborate how you would like the salary formula to be like.


Pretty easy, cap salaries at 250k and let the managers train the players as long as they want.

Advertisement