BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > 2-3 zone

2-3 zone

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
206656.58 in reply to 206656.57
Date: 1/31/2012 5:07:43 PM
Matrix Mighty Dunkers
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
10021002
offcourse that have borders but..., maybe experience has a lot to say.

at the other hand what do You think about yesterday B3 game who will win balanced Philo or salary Dionysus?

This Post:
00
206656.59 in reply to 206656.58
Date: 1/31/2012 5:23:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i bet on dyonysus snce beginning of the ko round, and stay with it.(btw just because he pay high salarys don't mean he is unbalanced)

Edit: even when fnag injury hurt him.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/31/2012 5:25:40 PM

This Post:
00
206656.60 in reply to 206656.59
Date: 1/31/2012 5:26:12 PM
Matrix Mighty Dunkers
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
10021002
Like me, Yes I know a lot about his players

This Post:
00
206656.61 in reply to 206656.46
Date: 1/31/2012 9:20:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
if you are right and choose the 2-3 you have a slight advantage over a man to man defence, but if you are wrong the disadvantage is pretty huge.

This makes the most sense to me.

2-3 zone seems to work best when the other team has very, VERY little outside game and your SF and PF don't have atrocious OD.

From: Marot

This Post:
00
206656.62 in reply to 206656.55
Date: 2/1/2012 6:53:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
(42674711)

german finals, look at the salary difference of those teams ;)


Not bad, interesting result.

But why he didn't try 2-3 in B3? (Just curious)

This Post:
00
206656.63 in reply to 206656.62
Date: 2/5/2012 8:28:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
(42674712)

pure Gold for all 23 zone Haterade groupies...damn scray field goal percentage from the arc by Brezels 3 Range Monsters :-DDDD

This Post:
22
206656.64 in reply to 206656.63
Date: 2/5/2012 9:40:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
This match is great example that 2-3 zone works, because winner used 2-3 and won.

This Post:
11
206656.65 in reply to 206656.63
Date: 2/5/2012 9:41:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
This match is great example that 2-3 zone doesn't work, because loser used 2-3 and lost.

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
206656.66 in reply to 206656.51
Date: 2/8/2012 2:56:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
3-2 is not the best defense against Motion. M2M is better.

With 2-3 defense he allowed 15 assists to opponent's PG and 14-16 shooting to his PF. Tell me how did 2-3 work in this game? Kalevan KoriKonkarit had better attack and his opponent chose a bad defensive tactic.

This Post:
11
206656.67 in reply to 206656.66
Date: 2/8/2012 3:10:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
3-2 is not the best defense against Motion. M2M is better.

With 2-3 defense he allowed 15 assists to opponent's PG and 14-16 shooting to his PF. Tell me how did 2-3 work in this game? Kalevan KoriKonkarit had better attack and his opponent chose a bad defensive tactic.



it all depends on the skills....paaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh...i won the championship usin 23 zone in all PO games!!!

i know its funny but did u guys didnt think the 23 and LI Haterade is empty!?!? :p

This Post:
00
206656.68 in reply to 206656.67
Date: 2/8/2012 3:21:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Miami Heat went to Europe for three months and won all their games using 2-3 zones, 2-3 zone rocks!!

/sarsacm

it all depends on the skills....paaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh...i won the championship usin 23 zone in all PO games!!! against inferior opponents who'd I win also with M2M


There's the correct quote.

Advertisement