BuzzerBeater Forums

Well, I don't know for a fact if SB altered,forced miss, or blocked shots are calculated in the initial stats and quality of shots in justins simulations. If they are calculated, then I guess I have alot more to learn about push

Good to have a confirmation on p/100 not being that relevant when 3-2 with good shot blockers is deployed. Have suspected as much looking at some of the box scores we and other similarly built teams have had.

Also, it's obviously no use to simply look at the averages on p/100 when one team plays with shot blockers and a tactic that minimizes how many shots they will take during the game. But maybe you already took that into account in your calculations Joe, more so pointing this out to someone else earlier simply throwing out the averages.

But nonetheless, we were most definitely on the plus side of rng yesterday having the game that close while risking two misses on the GDP. The stronger team won, no question whatsoever.

Congratulations to both teams.
Tight score despite what all of you wrote before-maybe we should temper game engine a little bit .
But 3-2 with unique build monster blockers is doing a job.
I guess DLR did PtB so he wouldn't be guessed even once.
Kuosmanen 7blocks in B3 final - noice.

DLR with big chances to win 3 trophies in one season(polish cup-won, B3-won, PLK final 1-0)

On May 26th in 1987, Larry Bird stole an inbound pass from Isiah Thomas and dished it to Dennis Johnson for a layup, which turned out to be the game-winner in Game 5 of the Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons at the Boston Garden.

4.. 0:23...89 - 92.. B. Chrószcz (A) attempts a three-point shot from the wing, guarded closely by M. Trygg (H). Shot missed.
4.. 0:23...89 - 92.. S. Zygo (A) flew in from the wing to grab the offensive rebound.
4.. 0:21...91 - 92.. S. Zygo (A) reaches up and tries to tip it in over R. Kuosmanen (H). Scored.
4.. 0:13...91 - 92.. Ł. Pozorski (A) intercepted a pass.
4.. 0:03...93 - 92.. S. Zygo (A) gets off a great pass to B. Chrószcz (A). B. Chrószcz (A) attempts a baseline jumper. Scored.
4.. 0:03...93 - 92.. 30 second timeout called by Hupipalloilijat.
4.. 0:00...93 - 92.. J. Tanhuanpää (H) tries to bank one in from the wing with M. Codispoti (A) right in his face. Shot missed.
4.. 0:00...93 - 92.. End of period.

Sulo Vilja won't be sleeping for a long while. Missed a shot to ice the game and then gets ripped with 13 seconds left down 1.

Last edited by Yellow cake at 2/2/2023 5:34:39 AM

248 od 250 with full missed GDP? Or what? What would have happened if he had not predicted anything?

Without the bad predictions the % of win for DLR decreases from 99 to 89% (official source)

This is really surprising...

248 od 250 with full missed GDP? Or what? What would have happened if he had not predicted anything?

Without the bad predictions the % of win for DLR decreases from 99 to 89% (official source)

This is really surprising...

Why? It seems logical to me that your win % is better when your opponent fails in his predictions...

What is surprising for me is that he already had an 89% victory change without GDPs missed. I would have expected something like 50-60% and GDPs to have a much greater impact on the average simulation.